MHB BBandaRR's questions at Yahoo Answers regarding optimization

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving calculus optimization problems involving geometric shapes. The first problem focuses on finding the dimensions of the largest rectangle inscribed in the ellipse defined by the equation 9x² + 16y² = 144, with the solution involving the use of derivatives and the method of Lagrange multipliers. The second and third problems deal with maximizing the area of an isosceles trapezoid and a trapezoidal gutter, respectively, using similar optimization techniques. The responses emphasize the importance of engaging with the problem-solving process rather than simply providing answers, fostering a deeper understanding of calculus concepts. Overall, the thread highlights effective methods for tackling optimization problems in geometry.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

CALCULUS worded problems HELP?

5) Find the dimensions of the largest rectangle that can be inscribed in the ellipse 9x² + 16y² = 144. The sides of the rectangle are parallel to the axes of the ellipse.

6) An isosceles trapezoid has a lower base of 16 cm and the sloping sides are each 8 cm. Find the width of the upper base for greatest area.

7) A trapezoidal gutter is to be made from a sheet of tin 22 cm wide by bending up the edges. If the base is 14 cm wide, what width across the top gives the greatest carrying capacity?

Please EXPLAIN if necessary.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello BBandaRR,

5.) I am assuming we wish to maximize the area of the resulting rectangle. By the symmetry of the ellipse and thus the inscribed rectangle, we need only concern ourselves with the first quadrant. So, let's first draw a diagram:

View attachment 1259

The area $A$ of the rectangle is our objective function:

$$A(x,y)=xy$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=9x^2+16y^2-144=0$$

Using a single-variable method, we may solve the constraint for either variable, and then substitute into the objective function to get the area as a function of one variable, and then use differentiation to find the maximum value. However, if we observe that maximizing the square of the area function times some constant is equivalent to maximizing the area itself, we may make our computations of the derivatives much simpler. So let us write:

$$\left(4A(x,y) \right)^2=f(x,y)=x^2\left(16y^2 \right)$$

By the constraint, we have:

$$16y^2=144-9x^2$$

and so we may write:

$$f(x)=x^2\left(144-9x^2 \right)=144x^2-9x^4$$

Differentiating with respect to $x$, and equating the result to zero, we find:

$$f'(x)=288x-36x^3=36x\left(8-x^2 \right)=0$$

Since $x$ must be non-negative, we have the two critical values:

$$x=0,\,2\sqrt{2}$$

Computing the second derivative, we find:

$$f''(x)=288-108x^2$$

And so we know the critical value $x=0$ is associated with a minimum and the critical value $x=2\sqrt{2}$ is associated with a maximum.

Thus, for this value of $x$, we find:

$$y=\sqrt{\frac{144-9\cdot8}{16}}=\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}}$$

Now, using the fact that we wish to include all 4 quadrants in our final answer, this means we need to double $x$ and $y$ to find the dimensions of the rectangle of largest area that can be inscribed withing the given ellipse.

Hence, the width $w$ of the rectangle is:

$$w=2x=4\sqrt{2}$$

and the height $h$ of the rectangle is:

$$h=2y=\frac{6}{\sqrt{2}}=3\sqrt{2}$$

Our result would seem to suggest that the ratio of the width to the height of the rectangle is equal to the ratio of the length of the horizontal axis to the vertical axis of the ellipse in which the rectangle is inscribed.

Let's prove this conjecture using Lagrange multipliers. We have the objective function:

$$A(x,y)=xy$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=b^2x^2+a^2y^2-a^2b^2=0$$

Note: the constraint is derived from $$\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=1$$.

And so, we obtain the following system:

$$y=\lambda\left(2b^2x \right)$$

$$x=\lambda\left(2a^2y \right)$$

This implies:

$$\lambda=\frac{y}{2b^2x}=\frac{x}{2a^2y}\implies \frac{x}{y}=\frac{a}{b}$$

Thus, our conjecture is true. Substitution into the constraint will yield the dimensions of the rectangle:

$$w=2x=\sqrt{2}a$$

$$h=2y=\sqrt{2}b$$

Problems 6.) and 7.) can both be solved by developing one theorem, that is to maximize the area of an isosceles trapezoid, given the base and the length of the slanted sides. Let's begin by drawing a diagram:

View attachment 1260

And so our objective function is:

$$A(h,x)=\frac{1}{2}(b+2x+b)h=(b+x)h$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(h,x)=x^2+h^2-s^2=0$$

Solving the constraint for $h$, we find:

$$h=\sqrt{s^2-x^2}$$

And so we may write the objective function in one variable $x$:

$$A(x)=(b+x)\sqrt{s^2-x^2}$$

Now, again we may observe that maximizing the square of the area function will maximize the area function itself, and so we may write:

$$A^2(x)=f(x)=(b+x)^2\left(s^2-x^2 \right)$$

Differentiating with respect to $x$, and equating to zero, we find:

$$f'(x)=(b+x)^2(-2x)+\left(s^2-x^2 \right)2(b+x)=-2(b+x)\left(2x^2+bx-s^2 \right)=0$$

The only valid critical value (given that $0<x$) is obtained from the quadratic formula:

$$x=\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2+8s^2}}{4}$$

The first derivative test shows that this critical value is associated with a maximum, if we observe that the factor $x+b$ must be positive, and the factors $-2\left(2x^2+bx-s^2 \right)$ are a parabola opening downward, and so is positive to the left of the larger root and negative to the right of this root.

Thus, the width $w$ across the top is:

$$w=b+2x=b+\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2+8s^2}}{2}=\frac{b+\sqrt{b^2+8s^2}}{2}$$

So, for problem 6.) we have:

$$b=16\text{ cm},\,s=8\text{ cm}$$

Hence:

$$w=\frac{16+\sqrt{16^2+8\cdot8^2}}{2}\text{ cm}=8\left(1+\sqrt{3} \right)\text{ cm}$$

And for problem 7.) we have:

$$b=14\text{ cm},\,s=4\text{ cm}$$

Hence:

$$w=\frac{14+\sqrt{14^2+8\cdot4^2}}{2}\text{ cm}=16\text{ cm}$$
 

Attachments

  • bbandarr1.jpg
    bbandarr1.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 140
  • bbandarr2.jpg
    bbandarr2.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 140
THANKS MAN !

I want you to know how much I appreciate your detailed answers. It is rare to find such answerers like you. With your help I was able to get my assignment done, and be confident going to school. (Rofl)
 
I am very pleased you decided to join us here at MHB!

I do wish to point out that we normally do not simply give complete solutions to problems posted here by our members. Our goal here for our registered members is actually loftier than that, in that we generally actively engage the person posting the question to take part in the process of solving the problem, so that the benefit is greater, i.e., more is learned.

I know I learn much more if someone guides me as I do something rather than just "pushes me aside" and instructs me to simply watch as they complete the task. It takes more time this way, but the benefit far outweighs this extra effort.

So, please feel free to post your questions here in the appropriate sub-forum, along with your work so we can see where you are stuck or may be going wrong. You will find we have many helpful and knowledgeable folks here who are glad to offer help. (Sun)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top