Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around identifying the best physics journals for condensed matter physics and for staying updated across all branches of physics. Participants explore various journal recommendations and strategies for keeping informed in the field.
Discussion Character
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that there is no single best journal for condensed matter physics, indicating that multiple journals may be necessary.
- One participant recommends the Physical Review Letters (PRL) and other Physical Review journals as a good starting point for condensed matter physics.
- Another participant emphasizes the importance of following citation trails from a core group of papers to stay informed, rather than relying solely on a limited number of journals.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that multiple journals are beneficial for comprehensive coverage, but specific recommendations and strategies vary, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach.
Contextual Notes
Participants express varying opinions on the necessity of multiple journals and the methods for staying updated, but do not resolve which specific journals are definitively the best.