Black holes and the centrifugal force paradox

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the paradoxical effects of centrifugal force in the context of black holes, particularly how objects orbiting close to black holes experience an inward-directed centrifugal force. Participants explore theoretical implications and visualizations related to this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jean-Marc introduces the topic and mentions a "reverse geometry" designed to illustrate the paradoxical effects of centrifugal force near black holes.
  • Another participant requests elaboration on the topic, indicating a lack of familiarity with the subject.
  • A participant references an article that discusses how an object in a circular orbit near a black hole experiences an inward centrifugal force, which is described as paradoxical from a Newtonian perspective.
  • There is mention of frame dragging and uncertainty about its relation to Newtonian gravity.
  • Jean-Marc recalls reading an article by Marek Abramovic and expresses a desire for feedback on his reverse geometry design, linking the paradox to cognitive biases as discussed in Kip Thorne's work.
  • Another participant expresses gratitude for the provided links, indicating interest in the resources shared.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the topic, and while some share resources and ideas, there is no clear consensus or resolution on the paradox itself or its implications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific articles and concepts, but the discussion remains open-ended with unresolved questions about the relationship between centrifugal force and black holes.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in astrophysics, general relativity, and the conceptual challenges posed by black holes may find this discussion relevant.

joebox
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi

Is someone interested in this topic ?

I'd like to share my idea with you, PF people. I also designed a "reverse geometry" to illustrate this paradoxical effect.

Thank you for your answer

Jean-Marc
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with this topic. Can you elaborate on it?
 
A web search came up with this:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/black-holes-and-the-centrifugal-for/

An object orbiting close to a black hole feels a centrifugal force pushing inward rather than outward. This paradoxical effect has important implications for astrophysics.

Unfortunately, you have to pay for the article. I didn't find much more than that. There is this arXiv article, however:
An intuitive approach to inertial forces and the centrifugal force paradox in general relativity

As the velocity of a rocket in a circular orbit near a black hole increases, the outwardly directed rocket thrust must increase to keep the rocket in its orbit. This feature might appear paradoxical from a Newtonian viewpoint, but we show that it follows naturally from the equivalence principle together with special relativity and a few general features of black holes.
 
This appears to relate to frame dragging. I'm not sure if, or how this works from a Newtonian gravity perspective.
 
Yes I read this article 20 years ago written by by Marek Abramovic in the 70s. By Fortunately, you don't need knowledge in mathematics to understand...
I'm try to "design" a reverse geometry to visualize this "paradoxical event" and I was wondering who could give me some feed-back.
Moreover I think that this paradoxical situation has its own limit linked to our cognitive bias (see eg "Black Holes and Time Warps" by Kip Thorne that explains the inside of the black hole, that allows to make the link between both statements).

Thanks
 
and thank you for the links !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K