Undergrad C in a Vacuum: Evidence of Constant?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evidence supporting the constancy of the speed of light (c) in a vacuum, particularly its invariance across different inertial frames. Participants reference the Michelson-Morley experiment as foundational in establishing this principle, while also noting that the theory of Special Relativity (SR) makes numerous predictions that have been empirically validated. The conversation highlights the distinction between "constant" and "invariant," with a focus on the latter as it pertains to the speed of light. A specific FAQ on the experimental basis of Special Relativity is recommended for further insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (STR)
  • Familiarity with the Michelson-Morley experiment
  • Knowledge of the concepts of invariance and constants in physics
  • Basic grasp of empirical testing in scientific theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the FAQ on the experimental basis of Special Relativity for detailed evidence
  • Study the implications of the Michelson-Morley experiment on modern physics
  • Explore the concept of invariance in physics and its applications
  • Investigate other experiments that have tested the speed of light across various conditions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of light speed and its implications in the realm of Special Relativity.

pkc111
Messages
224
Reaction score
26
TL;DR
What evidence is there that the speed of light in a vacuum is an absolute constant. "Absolute" in the sense of invariant to an observer in any inertial frame of reference.
I understand that it is one of Einstein's postulates, however I don't know of any direct experiments which show that it is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In physics (as well as any other empirical science), you generally do not prove things. What you do is that you take a theory that makes certain predictions and then you go out and test those predictions empirically by performing experiments that could, a priori, falsify the theory.

In the case of the speed of light in vacuum, the original introduction as an assumption in the theory relied on experiments such as the Michelson-Morely experiments. However, the resulting theory also makes countless other predictions that have been tested to extreme levels of accuracy, such as the prediction that any massive particle cannot reach the speed of light in vacuum regardless of how much energy you provide. For example, observing an electron traveling faster than c would have falsified the theory.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
Thanks I understand your points.
I wasnt very clear.My question is what is the evidence that supports that c in a vacuum is a constant. I am not really talking about the experimental evidence for Special Theory of Relativity and the evidence for time dilation, mass dilation (electrons having speed limits etc) or length contraction etc. Although I can see your point if the STR was found not supported then perhaps one of the assumptions was not true.
Im referring more to specific evidence which has been gathered about the speed of light as an absolute constant.
 
Just to clarify, what do you mean by "constant" here? Do you mean that it doesn't change over time, or that it is the same in all inertial frames? Strictly, "constant" means the former, but I suspect you mean the latter (which is properly called "invariant").
 
Ibix said:
Just to clarify, what do you mean by "constant" here? Do you mean that it doesn't change over time, or that it is the same in all inertial frames? Strictly, "constant" means the former, but I suspect you mean the latter (which is properly called "invariant").
I mean "absolute constant", in the sense invariant.
 
pkc111 said:
I mean "absolute constant", in the sense invariant.
See section 3 of the FAQ linked from the thread weirdoguy linked, particularly the moving sources section.
 
Thanks Weirdoguy and Ibix I think that's exactly what I am after.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
924
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K