Can a finite collection of open discs cover a given set in two dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical problem of whether a finite collection of open discs in two-dimensional space can cover a given set. The key conclusion is that for any finite collection of open discs, there exists a pairwise disjoint subcollection such that the union of these discs, when scaled by a factor of three, covers the original set. This result is established through a solution attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, originally presented in Problem A-5 of the 1998 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open discs in Euclidean space
  • Familiarity with set theory and unions
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical competitions and problem-solving techniques
  • Concept of scaling in geometric contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of open discs in $\mathbb{R}^2$
  • Explore the concept of pairwise disjoint sets in set theory
  • Learn about covering sets in topology
  • Review solutions to previous William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competitions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students preparing for mathematical competitions, and anyone interested in geometric covering problems will benefit from this discussion.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Let $\mathcal F$ be a finite collection of open discs in $\mathbb R^2$ whose union contains a set $E\subseteq \mathbb R^2$. Show that there is a pairwise disjoint subcollection $D_1,\ldots, D_n$ in $\mathcal F$ such that \[E\subseteq \cup_{j=1}^n 3D_j.\]
Here, if $D$ is the disc of radius $r$ and center $P$, then $3D$ is the disc of radius $3r$ and center $P$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 241 - Nov 18, 2016

This was Problem A-5 in the 1998 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

Honorable mention to Kiwi for a good attempt, but not quite correct. The solution, attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, follows:

Define the sequence $D_i$ by the following greedy algorithm: let $D_1$ be the disc of largest radius (breaking ties arbitrarily),
let $D_2$ be the disc of largest radius not meeting $D_1$, let $D_3$ be the disc of largest radius not meeting $D_1$ or $D_2$,
and so on, up to some final disc $D_n$. To see that $E \subseteq \cup_{j=1}^n 3D_j$, consider a point in $E$; if it lies in one of the $D_i$, we are done. Otherwise, it lies in a disc $D$ of radius $r$, which meets one of the $D_i$ having radius $s \geq r$ (this is the only reason a disc can be skipped in our algorithm). Thus the centers lie at a distance $t < s+r$, and so every point at distance less than $r$ from the center of $D$ lies at distance at most $r + t < 3s$ from the center of the corresponding $D_i$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K