Can a Magnetic Floor Improve Roller Hockey Puck Handling and Gameplay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaredmt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea Roller
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of implementing a magnetic floor system to enhance roller hockey puck handling. One proposed solution involves creating a surface with small holes that blow air, similar to air hockey tables, while another suggests using a magnetic field to allow pucks to slide more easily. Key considerations include the thickness of the surface to support player weight and the significant air flow requirements, estimated at around 250,000 CFM, to maintain puck lift. Comparisons are made to the costs and maintenance of traditional ice rinks, highlighting the practicality of these innovative ideas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of air flow dynamics in sports surfaces
  • Knowledge of magnetic field applications in sports technology
  • Familiarity with roller hockey equipment and puck specifications
  • Basic principles of structural engineering for sports surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research air flow requirements for sports surfaces, focusing on CFM ratings
  • Explore magnetic field technology and its applications in sports
  • Investigate materials suitable for constructing a durable playing surface
  • Analyze cost comparisons between air-based systems and traditional ice rinks
USEFUL FOR

Sports engineers, roller hockey coaches, facility managers, and anyone interested in innovative solutions for improving puck handling in roller hockey.

jaredmt
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
my friend thought of an interesting idea and i was just wondering if it would be worth the money to do it, or if it seems practical.
the problem with roller hockey is that the puck, even with wheels on it, doesn't slide too well. its pretty difficult to handle the puck on wood and its 10x easier to handle a puck on ice. his idea was to have little holes all throughout the floor that blow air out, like the same concept in air hockey, only for real hockey. This would be pretty cool to have, but would it cost a lot of money? (how expensive compared to constructing/maintaining an ice rink?) and would it be too much of a hassel with repairs?

my other idea is to have circuits set up under the floor and when a switch turns on, a magnetic field is created giving the floor a charge. and the puck could have the same charge. the strenght of the field would be just strong enough to make the puck slide. only problem is i think ppl have metal components on their skates. so idk, my friends idea is probably better
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, by my quick estimates, an ice hockey rink is at least 600 times larger in area than a typical air hockey table. The idea is feasible as far as I'm concerned. I have no idea what kind of power is needed to keep the ice frozen, but in comparison, running some low flow compressors for puck lift has to be in the same ballpark.

A couple things that I think of off the bat: First, in order to have a safe playing surface, the holes would need to be very small to that your skates don't sink into them. This means there needs to be more them, but not a problem. The actual playing surface needs to be thick enough to take the maximum load, which people flying all over play could be substantial.

So the surface itself would need to be somewhat thick. Pumping through thousands of tiny holes could cause huge pressure losses, and drive the inefficiencies through the roof.

After quick google, it seams though good air hockey tables have CFM ratings of over 350, closer to 400. So, for your full-size rhink, you'll need around 250,000 CFM pumping through a whole lotta tiny holes.
 
A problem I foresee is that air hockey pucks are quite light, which allows them to float on air. Using very light pucks in real hockey probably wouldn't work well. You'd probably have to use heavier pucks and higher pressure air.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K