Can a stable nucleus ever spontaneously become (temporarily) unstable?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter asimov42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Stable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stable nuclei, such as carbon-12, cannot spontaneously become unstable due to the law of conservation of energy, which dictates that any potential decay products would be heavier than the original nucleus. Quantum vacuum fluctuations are necessary for an unstable nucleus to decay, but these fluctuations cannot induce instability in stable nuclei. The discussion confirms that an isolated stable atom will remain stable indefinitely, as there are no decay pathways available that would allow it to transition to a lighter element.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear decay processes, including beta decay and electron capture.
  • Familiarity with quantum vacuum fluctuations and their role in nuclear stability.
  • Knowledge of the law of conservation of energy as it pertains to nuclear reactions.
  • Basic concepts of entropy and its implications in nuclear decay.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of quantum mechanics related to nuclear stability and decay.
  • Explore the implications of the law of conservation of energy in nuclear physics.
  • Study the role of entropy in nuclear reactions and decay processes.
  • Investigate the characteristics and behaviors of other stable and unstable isotopes.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear engineers, and students studying nuclear physics who seek to understand the principles governing nuclear stability and decay processes.

asimov42
Messages
376
Reaction score
4
Hi folks,

I have what might be a naive question about the decay of unstable nuclei. I've recently been reading about various decay processes (e.g. beta decay, electron capture etc.).

Specifically, I'm wondering if it is ever possible for a stable nucleus (say, carbon-12 or any other stable nucleus) to spontaneously become unstable, and then to undergo further decay processes (e.g. a different sequence, resulting in, say, a lighter element)? I understand that the trigger for decay in an unstable nucleus involves quantum vacuum fluctuations, which provide the activation energy required, and that moves towards the ground state result in an increase in entropy. I guess I'm asking if there are vacuum fluctuations large enough to temporarily 'excite' a nucleus into an unstable state, such that an alternative sequence of decay processes can occur (resulting in a larger final entropy). Would the required initial decrease in entropy (to put the nucleus in an excited state) prevent this from occurring? I.e. I would think that this type of process cannot run backwards, but I'm not sure?

Put differently: if we consider (hypothetically) an isolated, stable atom (with stable nucleus - again, e.g. carbon-12) floating alone in space, will it remain stable forever? (ignoring the possibility of proton decay etc...)

Thanks all. Apologies if my question isn't very clear.

J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stable nuclei are called stable precisely because they can't decay. Uranium 235 can decay because you can find two or more nuclei that, combined, have the right number of neutrons and protons and weigh less than the original nucleus. There is a potential barrier that keeps it from decaying immediately and a quantum fluctuation is required for the nucleus to decay.

Carbon-12 is stable because there's nothing it could decay to. Any combination of decay products would be heavier than the original nucleus. Law of conservation of energy prevents carbon-12 from decaying.
 
And indeed, an unstable nucleus is stable until the moment it decays.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
695
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K