Can an F1 Car Stay Upside Down if the Track Ends?

  • Context: Automotive 
  • Thread starter Thread starter herrherrlich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of an F1 car remaining upside down on a track that abruptly ends. Participants explore the dynamics of the car's motion as it loses contact with the track, considering factors such as downforce, momentum, and aerodynamic effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the 'net downforce' would initially cause the car to flip upwards when it loses contact with the track.
  • Another participant argues that the car would experience a small amount of lift but would quickly lose downforce due to air resistance and would fall back to Earth.
  • A different viewpoint states that once ground contact is lost, the car would tumble uncontrollably, as it would no longer have aerodynamic support.
  • Another participant supports the idea that the car would tumble, noting that the front wheels would leave the track first, creating a moment that would cause the car to rotate upwards.
  • One participant elaborates on the forces acting on the vehicle, suggesting that the distribution of lift forces could create a moment that leads to tumbling.
  • Another participant compares the situation to helicopters, discussing how uneven lift can cause moments that lead to instability, although this comment is more of a tangent than directly related to the F1 car scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of the F1 car once it loses contact with the track. There is no consensus on whether the car would flip upwards or tumble uncontrollably, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants make various assumptions about the forces acting on the car, including downforce, lift, and moments created by the distribution of forces. The discussion includes complex dynamics that are not fully resolved, and some participants suggest simplifying assumptions for analysis.

herrherrlich
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey everybody, first ever post here on the forums. Read a few of the threads so far and have been very entertained so far.

My question stems from a debate I had with a friend while taxiing out to the runway and got quite heated. So much though, that I think we may have irritated the entire cabin within earshot of us. It is a take-off of the old 'Upside Down F1' topic. Here is the scenario:

An unlimited resources investor actually puts this to the test and develops a track with miles of flat, straight real estate to work with. A track is constructed that allows the F1 car to get up to speed, create the necessary downforce and then provide a corkscrew gradual enough to maintain enough forward and angular momentum to complete the upside down test. The track levels off perfectly inverted and the F1 car remains planted upside down on the track at speed.

Now, IF the investor runs out of money and the track abruptly stops... Initially, does the F1 car fall to the ground due to gravity and wind resistance -OR- flip upwards towards the sky do to forward momentum and residual 'net downforce'?

My position was that the 'net downforce' would flip the car skyward - at least initially - and I would LOVE to rub some math in his face the next time this topic comes up.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Probably a small amount of lift (upwards downforce) raising the car slightly. Air resistance is very high at those speeds and without being powered the car would very rapidly slow down, lose downforce and come back to Earth.
 
neither...once ground contact is lost so is all aero and the car will tumble uncontrolably to a crash. Without the tunnel effect of channleing air under the car and over the splitters . spoilers etc...you have no down force and are riding a 200 mph brick..those huge tires are over 40 % of total aero drag.
 
While it may have a net force pushing it skywards the instant it leaves the track, RangerMike's assertion that it will just tumble is probably right. As soon as the angle of attack of the spoilers changes any small amount the car will tumble and (probably) break-up. Watching any F1 crash where the car gets some air under the front end and immediately tumbles up into the air is good proof of this.

211788-mark-webber-crash.jpg
 
The vehicle would tumble, after slightly rising, almost immediately. This is due to the fact that the front wheels must leave the road surface first. Once the normal force from the from axle is lost, there is nothing preventing the front end from accelerating in the y (up) direction. A non-zero moment will be created about the contact patch of the rear tire. As the vehicle then rotates upward, a rather large angle of attack will result. This will yield an even greater moment about the rear axle. By this time the rear wheels have left the surface. So the car has already begun to tumble uncontrollably before it has even fully left the road.

Now, if we want to really do a mind experiment, we must make the engineering assumption that the road instantaneously falls away (or rises away depending on your coordinate system). At this time a free body diagram can be made of all the forces acting on the vehicle. In the x direction, only drag remains, thus the vehicle must slow down. F=ma, where F also equals area*drag coeff.* vel^2*density*0.5. Divide this value by mass and we have acceleration in the negative x direction of course. That's the easy part. What we are really concerned with is forces in the y direction. For simplicity, let us also assume that lift is equal to mass*g. Ok, so now your thinking that it will fly until it slows enough to reduce lift. However, the placement of the forces is just as crucial as the magnitudes. Unless the sum of all the aero lift passes through the center of gravity, a moment will be created. This is called a force couple.

I do not know what type of lift forces the wings and body create in free space. But we can make more simplifying assumptions. We know that the greater the normal force, that greater the frictional force. the greater the frictional force the greater longitudinal acceleration. So I will assume that the rear wing produces much greater lift than the front. Also F1 rules dictate a weight distribution very near 46/54 front rear. Almost 50/50, so the center of g is split halfway between the axles. Since we have assumed lift is not distributed 50/50, we can make the educated assumption that a force couple is present and the vehicle will rotate and tumble out of control....


Then again, anythings possible...lets test it!
 
Jeez Rob, I think you went a little more complicated than what he was after, but hey...

It's kinda like why helicopters have hinges on the rotary wing, the blades create more lift on one side of the aircraft, thus crating a moment about the centre of gravity. The hinges compensate for this affect and if they weren't there, the helicopter would just tumble to the ground.
 
Yes, I think I remember a modern marvels episode on helo's that discussed that very problem early on in the development of helo's. Damn I love that show~!
 
Robstradamus said:
Yes, I think I remember a modern marvels episode on helo's that discussed that very problem early on in the development of helo's. Damn I love that show~!

I've never seen it, so going to go look it up.
 


time: 3:00
 
Last edited by a moderator: