Can Equations Be Aesthetic Art?

  • Context: Art 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2017 Art Contest
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
89 replies · 15K views
Messages
19,951
Reaction score
11,036
The goal is to create the most beautiful or interesting equation aesthetically (pleasing to the eye).
This is not about it's mathematical significance. Get your inner designer on!

  • Each member is allowed to post one equation
  • The equation can be completely made up
  • Must use LaTeX
  • Be creative!

To vote for an equation simply click the "like" button. You can vote more than once. The contest will close next Wed Sep 27th.

The winner will receive a PF T-Shirt!

ps. do not try to register new usernames for more entries or for likes. It's painfully easy to figure these out.

Have fun! Go!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
Physics news on Phys.org
I find it difficult to disregard meaning when it comes to aesthetically judge an equation so I will go with Stokes’ theorem for integration of differential forms. Both for its aesthetics in terms of its integral signs, simplicity in the form of the ##\omega##s appearing on both sides, and meaning:
$$
\int_{M} d\omega = \oint_{\partial M} \omega
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dwunder, Demystifier, Winny Tez and 12 others
This is a fun thread! I agree with @Orodruin that much of the beauty comes from the meaning; so I will go with an extension of the Cauchy integral formula.
$$\oint\frac{f(z)\;dz}{\left(z-z_{0}\right)^{n+1}}=\frac{2\pi i}{n!}f^{(n)}(z_{0})$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dwunder, ISamson, Idalia and 1 other person
Here's one I like:

$$\int~e^x = f(u^n)$$

You might need to think about this one a bit ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pi-is-3, ISamson, Cathr and 7 others
Mark44 said:
Here's one I like:

$$\int~e^x = f(u^n)$$

You might need to think about this one a bit ...
I think I saw this on a T-shirt once. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pi-is-3 and (deleted member)
Mark44 said:
Here's one I like:

$$\int~e^x = f(u^n)$$

You might need to think about this one a bit ...
Finally an equation that makes sense. Looks like I have a future in mathematics after all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pi-is-3, atyy and Tom.G
Mark44 said:
You might need to think about this one a bit ...
It looks difficult and unpleasant to me... :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu
OCR said:
It looks difficult and unpleasant to me... :oldtongue:
Only if you are very young and think that girls have cooties, or very old and can remember the how but not the why.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu, stoomart and S.G. Janssens
Ygggdrasil said:
##3987^{12} + 4365^{12} = 4472^{12}##

Ha! Ha! Ha! (already familiar with the backstory).
 
e + 1 = 0
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Convix, Comeback City, jeffbruma and 2 others
ohwilleke said:
e = -1
This one is the beauty in the contest and will always win, if mathematicians are honest with their votes, I think. I like the positive form ##e^{i\pi}+1=0## a little more, as there is also the ##0## involved: top of the pop, so to say. And I really have to fight myself, because I still have two other beauties in mind ... d... rule ##1## ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Idalia and Buzz Bloom
This was my mantra for a while.

e + 1 = 0
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dwunder
Mark44 said:
Here's one I like:

$$\int~e^x = f(u^n)$$

You might need to think about this one a bit ...
I'm willing to be the idiot and admit I don't get it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Comeback City, jedishrfu and atyy
martinbn said:
Only if you are very young and think that girls have cooties arithmetic bugs* [snip...]
OCR said:
It looks difficult and unpleasant to me... :oldtongue:
You did see . :oldtongue: . right... ? .


*Definition of arithmetic bugs:

"They added to your troubles, subtracted from your pleasures, divided your attention, and multiplied like hell...!"

Lol...
 
Last edited:
This one's kinda purty:

$$1+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{1+\ddots}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\cdots}}}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wilson Donald Rohan, dwunder, scottdave and 10 others
ohwilleke said:
e + 1 = 0
You stole my profile picture :eek: (at least an equivalent form haha)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
$$(\Box+\mu^2)\psi = 0$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney
Extending Laurent's Theorem to algebraic functions:

$$
\begin{equation}
w_n(z)= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k (z^{1/n})^k+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{b_k}{\left(z^{1/n}\right)^k} \\
a_k=\frac{1}{2n\pi i} \int\!\!\!\!\! 8 \frac{w_n(z)}{\left(z^{1/n}\right)^{k+n}} dz\\
b_k=\frac{1}{2n\pi i} \int\!\!\!\!\! 8 w_n(z)\left(z^{1/n}\right)^{k-n} dz
\end{equation}
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dwunder and Geometry_dude
$$\frac{16}{64}\cdot\frac{26}{65}\cdot\frac{19}{95}\cdot\frac{49}{98} = \frac{1\!\!\!\not6}{\not64}\frac{\not2^{1}\!\!\!\not6}{\not65}\frac{1\!\!\!\not9}{\not95}\frac{\not4^{1}\!\!\!\not9}{\not9\!\!\!\not8_{\not21}}=\frac{1}{4\cdot5\cdot5}=\frac{1}{100}$$
:biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and Greg Bernhardt
The vacuum Einstein equation:

$$\text{Ric} = 0 $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, Cathr and ohwilleke