Can Harmonic Functions Agree at All Points in a Bounded Domain?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that two harmonic functions, $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$, defined on a bounded domain $\Omega \subset \mathbb R^3$, must be equal throughout the domain if they satisfy the boundary condition: $\phi_1 \frac{\partial \phi_1}{\partial n} + \phi_2 \frac{\partial \phi_2}{\partial n} = \phi_2 \frac{\partial \phi_1}{\partial n} + \phi_1 \frac{\partial \phi_2}{\partial n}$ on the boundary $\partial \Omega$. The conclusion is that under these conditions, $\phi_1 = \phi_2$ holds true everywhere in $\Omega$. This result is significant in the study of harmonic functions and their properties in mathematical analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic functions in mathematical analysis
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems in partial differential equations
  • Knowledge of normal derivatives and their application on boundaries
  • Basic concepts of bounded domains in $\mathbb R^3$
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of harmonic functions and their uniqueness theorems
  • Explore boundary value problems in the context of Laplace's equation
  • Learn about normal derivatives and their significance in differential equations
  • Investigate applications of harmonic functions in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and researchers in mathematical analysis who are interested in the properties and applications of harmonic functions in bounded domains.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ be harmonic functions on a bounded domain $\Omega \subset \mathbb R^3$ such that \[\phi_1 \frac{\partial \phi_1}{\partial n} + \phi_2 \frac{\partial \phi_2}{\partial n} = \phi_2 \frac{\partial \phi_1}{\partial n} + \phi_1 \frac{\partial \phi_2}{\partial n}\quad \text{on}\quad \partial \Omega\]
Prove that $\phi_1 = \phi_2$ everywhere in $\Omega$. [The operator $\frac{\partial}{\partial n}$ denotes the normal derivative on $\partial \Omega$.]

-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem correctly, but that's ok since it was tacitly assumed that $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ agree at some point in $\Omega$. (Smile) You can read my solution below.

If $\phi := \phi_1 - \phi_2$, then $\phi \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial n} = 0$ on $\partial \Omega$ and $\nabla^2 \phi = 0$ in $\Omega$. By Green's formula, $$\int_\Omega \lvert \nabla \phi\rvert^2\, dx = \oint_{\partial \Omega} \phi \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial n}\, dS - \int_{\Omega} \phi \nabla^2 \phi\, dx = 0 - 0 = 0$$ Hence $\lvert \nabla \phi\rvert^2 = 0$. Since $\Omega$ is connected $\phi$ is constant. As $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ agree at some point in $\Omega$, $\phi$ must be zero at that point, making $\phi$ identically zero. Hence $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ are identical.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K