MHB Can Nigel or Jessica Ensure Divisibility of a Polynomial by \(x-2012\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
AI Thread Summary
In the game involving the polynomial \(P(x)=a_0+a_1x+\cdots+a_{2011}x^{2011}+x^{2012}\), Nigel and Jessica take turns assigning values to the coefficients with the aim of either ensuring or preventing divisibility by \(m(x)=x-2012\). Nigel plays first and seeks to prevent \(P(2012) = 0\), while Jessica aims to make it true. The key to the game lies in the fact that Jessica can always respond to Nigel's moves to maintain her strategy. Ultimately, Jessica has a winning strategy by carefully choosing her responses to Nigel's assignments. The outcome confirms that with optimal play, Jessica can ensure \(P(x)\) is divisible by \(x-2012\).
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Consider a polynomial

$$P(x)=a_0+a_1x+\cdots+a_{2011}x^{2011}+x^{2012}$$
Nigel and Jessica are playing the following game. In turn, they choose one of the coefficients $a_0,\,\cdots,\,a_{2011}$ and assign a real value to it. Nigel has the first move. Once a value is assigned to a coefficient, it cannot be changed any more. The game ends after all the coefficients have been assigned values.

Jessica's goal is to make $P(x)$ divisible by a fixed polynomial $m(x)$ and Nigel's goal is to prevent this.

Which of the players has a winning strategy if $m(x)=x-2012$?​

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations to the following members for their correct solution:

1. kaliprasad
2. MarkFL

Solution from MarkFL:
In order to win, Jessica wants to have at the end (since she has the last move):

$$P(2012)=0$$

or:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{2011}\left(a_k2012^k\right)+2012^{2012}=0$$

or:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{2011}\left(a_k2012^k\right)=-2012^{2012}$$

No matter what values Nigel and Jessica have chosen for the first 2,011 coefficients, all Jessica has to do is choose for the last ($a_\ell$ where $0\le\ell\le2011$) which can be obtained from:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{\ell-1}\left(a_k2012^k\right)+a_{\ell}2012^{\ell}+\sum_{k=\ell+1}^{2011}\left(a_k2012^k\right)=-2012^{2012}$$

Solving for $a_{\ell}$, we find:

$$a_{\ell}=-\frac{1}{2012^{\ell}}\left(\sum_{k=0}^{\ell-1}\left(a_k2012^k\right)+\sum_{k=\ell+1}^{2011}\left(a_k2012^k\right)+2012^{2012}\right)$$

With this value for $a_{\ell}$, Jessica is assured of winning the game.
 
Back
Top