Can Pluto Twinkle Like Stars from Earth?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pluto
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether Pluto can twinkle like stars when observed from Earth. It explores the conditions under which atmospheric turbulence affects the visibility of distant celestial bodies, particularly focusing on Pluto's size and brightness compared to stars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that stars twinkle due to atmospheric turbulence, while planets typically do not because they appear larger than the atmospheric distortions.
  • Others argue that Pluto, being small and distant, might be considered a point source of light, potentially allowing it to twinkle under certain conditions.
  • One participant mentions that Pluto is not visible to the naked eye, with a magnitude of 13, which is significantly dimmer than the threshold for naked-eye visibility.
  • Another participant suggests that significant twinkling could be observed through telescopes, especially with higher magnification, as Pluto would appear as a point of light.
  • Some participants provide links to images of Pluto twinkling and discuss the mathematical techniques used to analyze such observations.
  • There is a discussion about the speckle imaging technique, which aims to mitigate atmospheric effects, but one participant questions its relevance to the twinkling discussion.
  • Participants discuss the angular diameters of various celestial objects, noting that Pluto's angular diameter is smaller than the atmospheric distortion, which could contribute to its twinkling.
  • Questions arise regarding the angular diameter of stars, with some participants mentioning specific stars and their sizes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Pluto can twinkle like stars, with some supporting the idea based on its size and distance, while others emphasize its lack of visibility and the effects of atmospheric distortion. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about atmospheric conditions and the definitions of twinkling. The discussion also highlights the dependence on observational techniques and the unresolved mathematical aspects of imaging methods.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Stars twinkle because our atmosphere's turbulence causes these point-like bodies to scintillate, whereas planets supposedly appear large enough not to twinkle. Is Pluto (a distant and small planetoid) enough of a point to twinkle as seen from Earth?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Loren Booda said:
Stars twinkle because our atmosphere's turbulence causes these point-like bodies to scintillate, whereas planets supposedly appear large enough not to twinkle. Is Pluto (a distant and small planetoid) enough of a point to twinkle as seen from Earth?

Pluto is not visible to the naked eye from Earth. At a mag of 13, it is orders of magnitude below naked eye visible (~6.6) and below any other stars you will see.
 
By "seeing" I was trying to refer to the term for atmospheric scintillation (twinkling), whether observed by telescope or naked eye. Let me rephrase: is it possible to encounter significant "twinkling" when observing Pluto from Earth?
 
Yes: the more you magnify an object, the more atmospheric scintillation comes into play. And Pluto is so small, it would barely be more than a point of light in even a very large amateur telescope.
 
twofish-quant said:
Here are some pictures of Pluto "twinkling"

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1987A&A...174..295B/0000297.000.html

What you can do with Pluto is to take lots of short observation of the planet twinkling, and then run them through some mathematics to get the shape of Pluto and its moon Charon.
Why does it appear that there are two images of Charon in the photos - is that due to diffraction?
 
Speckle is a technique where you take an image of the pupil plane (essentialy the Fourier transform of the image) and then create an image by fitting an interative model to the data.
One of the side effects of the process is that you have a symmetric image because there aren't enough degrees of freedom in the data to decide which is correct.

Also the point of speckle is to remove atmopsheric twinkle effects - so it's a bit pointless in this discussion. Pluto would twinkle like a star through a telescope powerfull enough to see it. Planets don't twinkle because they are several times bigger than the size of the atmospheric distortion (1arc sec), pluto is smaller than this
 
mgb_phys said:
Planets don't twinkle because they are several times bigger than the size of the atmospheric distortion (1arc sec), pluto is smaller than this
For everyone's info, that's probably a good number for an average day, but it can be worse or better, probably on a range of 0.1 to 2 arcsec 90% of the time.

The angular diameters of a few objects as viewed from Earth:
Andromeda Galaxy: 11,400 arcsec
Sun/Moon: 1,800 arcsec
Jupiter: 40 arcsec
Europa: 1.0 arcsec
Pluto: 0.10 arcsec (looked it up - that's actually bigger than I expected)
Betelgeus: 0.050 arcsec
 
Russ, what's the star with the largest angular diameter as seen from earth? Gamma Crucis perhaps? It's rather large and quiet close.
 
  • #10
In the northern hemisphere it's probably Betelgues. We took images of it using a speckle-like technique that resolve bright spots on the star
 
  • #11
In the southern hemisphere it's R Doradus, with an angular diameter of 0.06 arcsec. For many reasons, R Doradus is nowhere as interesting as Betelgeuse and is relatively obscure.
 
  • #12
The mirror image comes as a result of the mathematics that the use to get the images from the speckles. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with the math to know why that happens and would welcome someone that knows more about interferometry to chime in.
 
  • #13
Basically because you don't have any information on the absolute phase so the reconstruction algorithm has two (- and +) solutions.
 
  • #14
Vanadium 50 said:
Russ, what's the star with the largest angular diameter as seen from earth? Gamma Crucis perhaps? It's rather large and quiet close.
Don't actually know, sorry - I just pulled a few out of the air, plus looked a wiki for the question.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K