Can Raising and Lowering Operators Be Found for an Anharmonic Oscillator?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hilbert2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator Quantum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the possibility of finding raising and lowering operators for an anharmonic oscillator, specifically those described by Hamiltonians that include higher-order terms in the potential energy. Participants explore theoretical approaches and existing literature related to this topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the existence of raising and lowering operators for an anharmonic oscillator, noting that while such operators exist in general, they may not be simple functions of position and momentum operators.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the existence of simple creation and annihilation operators for anharmonic oscillators, referencing specific literature that discusses this issue.
  • A different participant introduces the concept of action-angle variables as an approximate method to derive raising and lowering operators, explaining the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule and its limitations in providing accurate results for non-harmonic systems.
  • The action-angle approach is described as yielding heuristic forms for raising and lowering operators, but it is noted that this method does not uniquely determine quantum forms due to operator ordering ambiguities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of simple raising and lowering operators for anharmonic oscillators. There are competing views regarding the effectiveness of the action-angle method and its applicability to quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the approximation methods discussed, particularly the dependence on the semiclassical limit and the challenges posed by operator ordering ambiguities.

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,611
Reaction score
611
Let's say I have an anharmonic 1D oscillator that has the hamiltonian

##H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}kx^2+\lambda x^4##

or some other hamiltonian with higher than second-order terms in the potential energy. Is it possible, in general, to find raising and lowering operators for such a system? I mean operators that commute with the hamiltonian in such a way that they transform an eigenstate of ##H## into another eigenstate that has a higher or lower eigenvalue (of course the eigenvalues will not be evenly spaced in the anharmonic situation). I remember reading an article where someone solved the Morse oscillator system with some kind of generalized raising and lowering operators, but for some reason I can't access the full text anymore.

How would I go about constructing an example of an oscillator hamiltonian that is anharmonic and for which the creation and annihilation operators can be found?

EDIT: Yes, of course such operators exist for any quantum system, but usually they are not a simple function of the x and p operators.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Action-Angle Variables

There is an approximate way to get raising and lowering operators for an arbitrary potential that uses the heuristic of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule. Unfortunately, it's only an approximation which is good in the semiclassical limit. I don't know how to systematically get better and better approximations.

The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule is this:

First, using classical dynamics, you define the action variable J as follows:
J = \frac{1}{2 \pi}\int \sqrt{2m(E - V(x))} dx

This gives J as a function of E. If you invert this, to get E as a fuction of J, then you can define an angular frequency \omega via:

\omega = \dfrac{\partial E}{\partial J}

Finally, you create a new angle variable \theta to be just

\theta = \omega t

The pair \theta, J act as a generalized coordinate and corresponding momentum. In principle, you can figure out how to compute \theta, J from the usual coordinates x, p. The advantage to the \theta, J description is that the dynamics are particularly simple: the energy only depends on J, and so (by the hamilton equations of motion), the time dependence of \theta is trivial.

To relate this to quantum mechanics, Bohr and Sommerfeld proposed the quantization rule:

J = n \hbar

Since E can be computed from J, this gives you an indirect quantization of E.

The problem with this approach is that it's only an approximation. The rule J = n \hbar is only good in the limit where n \gg 1. For the harmonic oscillator, it gives E = n \hbar \omega rather than E = (n + 1/2) \hbar \omega

Anyway, action-angle variables gives a heuristic starting point for the raising and lowering operators a and a^\dagger:

a^\dagger = \sqrt{J} e^{i \theta}
a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J}

Since J is the momentum canonical to \theta, we have the quantization rule [J, \theta] = -i \hbar. If |n\rangle is an eigenstate of J with eigenvalue n \hbar, then a^\dagger |n\rangle is an eigenstate with eigenvalue (n+1) \hbar.

So a^\dagger = \sqrt{J} e^{i \theta} and a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J} a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J} give starting points for raising and lowering operators for an arbitrary potential. However, knowing the classical forms of J and \theta as functions of p and x doesn't uniquely determine the quantum forms, because of operator ordering ambiguity (which can be thought of as the source of the 1/2 \hbar \omega error in the harmonic oscillator case).

Action-angle variables is a very rich subject in classical mechanics, although not a lot has been done with it in quantum mechanics, except in the old quantum theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K