Can we know what exists in planets' subsurfaces?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using advanced technology to explore the subsurface of planets, particularly in the context of detecting potential life. Participants consider the use of radio waves or microwaves, similar to those used by the Arecibo telescope, to penetrate various materials and image what lies beneath the surface of planets like Venus or hypothetical Earth-like planets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using radio waves or microwaves to penetrate planetary surfaces, assuming advanced technology is available.
  • Others argue that telescopes primarily receive signals and that sending signals over vast distances poses significant challenges.
  • There is a suggestion that if technology were advanced enough, direct exploration of such planets would be more effective than remote sensing.
  • Participants discuss the capabilities of the Arecibo telescope, noting its use in mapping the surface of Venus but highlighting the difficulty of imaging subsurface features.
  • Some mention that while radar can provide topographical data, it does not reveal what lies beneath the surface of Venus.
  • Ground-penetrating radar techniques used on Earth are referenced, indicating that similar methods would be challenging to apply to other planets.
  • One participant mentions the GRaND instrument on the Dawn spacecraft, which detects materials at a depth of up to one meter, but clarifies that it does not directly image subsurface structures.
  • There is speculation about the potential for future advancements in technology to enhance the ability to explore subsurfaces of planets.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of current technology in penetrating solid materials like rock and metal.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the feasibility of using radio waves to explore subsurfaces. While some acknowledge the potential of advanced technology, others emphasize the current limitations and challenges involved in such explorations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on hypothetical advancements in technology, the challenges of signal transmission over vast distances, and the inherent difficulties in penetrating solid materials. The discussion does not resolve the technical feasibility of the proposed methods.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring planetary science, astrobiology, and the technological challenges of subsurface exploration in planetary environments.

Noduagga
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
imagine this situation: there's a very similar planet to Earth with almost the same atmosphere and surface. we want to know what lies beyond the surface to know if life exists there. so could we send or observe radio waves or microwaves with a similar telescope as arecibo that penetrates several cm of pure aluminium and image the subsurface beyond it? (supposing we'd had enough technology able to see at those distances)?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Noduagga said:
imagine this situation: there's a very similar planet to Earth with almost the same atmosphere and surface. we want to know what lies beyond the surface to know if life exists there. so could we send or observe radio waves or microwaves with a similar telescope as arecibo that penetrates several cm of pure aluminium and image the subsurface beyond it? (supposing we'd had enough technology)?
Telescopes don't send out emissions, they just receive. And, even if we wanted to send a signal that far, the distances are just too great to ever hope to receive anything back no matter how strong a signal was sent out.
 
Borg said:
Telescopes don't send out emissions, they just receive. And, even if we wanted to send a signal that far, the distances are just too great to ever hope to receive anything back no matter how strong a signal was sent out.
yes i know, but let's imagine we'd had enough technology or this planet was at the same distance as Mars or jupiter, will this work?
 
Noduagga said:
yes i know, but let's imagine we'd had enough technology or this planet was at the same distance as Mars or jupiter, will this work?
If we were that advanced, it would be a lot easier to just go there to perform the measurement.

I really don't get the "pure aluminum" surface statement in your original post but we would notice something like that with today's technology and would be sending probes to examine a surface like that. Imaging several cm of the surface with or without a metal covering at those distances would be beyond any technology that I can imagine.
 
Noduagga said:
yes i know, but let's imagine we'd had enough technology or this planet was at the same distance as Mars or jupiter, will this work?

The Aricebo radio telescope can be configured to be used for both transmit and receive
The surface of Venus was successfully radar mapped using the Arecibo Dish to see what was under the cloud cover.
Ham radio operators have even used the same dish to reflect radio signals off Venus and back to earth
This is regularly done off the moon ... it's called moon bounce. As far as I'm aware, Venus is the only other
planet from which this has been done.

but seeing what is below the surface is another much higher level of difficultyDave
 
davenn said:
The Aricebo radio telescope can be configured to be used for both transmit and receive
The surface of Venus was successfully radar mapped using the Arecibo Dish to see what was under the cloud cover.
Ham radio operators have even used the same dish to reflect radio signals off Venus and back to earth
This is regularly done off the moon ... it's called moon bounce. As far as I'm aware, Venus is the only other
planet from which this has been done.

but seeing what is below the surface is another much higher level of difficultyDave
Let me see if i understood... can we know then what lies beyond the sueface of venus?
 
Noduagga said:
Let me see if i understood... can we know then what lies beyond the sueface of venus?
no, I didn't say that
 
davenn said:
no, I didn't say that
So, the radio bouncing in venus cannot tell us that? How can we do it then?
 
Noduagga said:
So, the radio bouncing in venus cannot tell us that? How can we do it then?

bouncing radio signals (radar) off the surface of Venus tells us the topography of the surface ...
Highs, lows, large bumps ( hills - mountains) etc ... we don't know what is below the surface of Venus

it's difficult enough to do ground penetrating radar of the Earth from orbit, let alone other planets in our solar system or beyond

MOST ground penetrating radar for below the Earth's surface is done at the surface using sound
small portable units are good for a couple of metres or so ... used lots in archaeology

NY_Dutchess_GroundPenetratingRadar.JPG
much larger systems use thumper trucks, strong sound boomers or explosives
these are used in seismic mapping and are good up to a couple of km's

Marine-Seismic-Survey-Cartoon.jpg


illustration%20of%20seismic%20surveying.jpg


p-9759-gns.jpg
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
  • #10
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #11
1oldman2 said:
As I understand it, the GRaND instrument on Dawn is able to detect certain materials at a depth of up to one meter,
http://dawn.jpl.nasa.gov/technology/grand.html

it's not detecting subsurface directly as in ground penetrating radar
It is detecting surface emissions caused by cosmic rays that penetrate the surface and interact of with minerals etc up to 1m depthDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
  • #12
davenn said:
it's not detecting subsurface directly as in ground penetrating radar
It is detecting surface emissions caused by cosmic rays that penetrate the surface and interact of with minerals etc up to 1m depthDave
This is true, I was just fishing for possible ways the op's question might be answered. tricky business with today's tech but one never knows what's around the corner.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #13
Thanks! And it would be possible (or is it possible already) to increase the strength and sensibility of ground based telescopes and astronomy radars to know what lies beyond the surface of planets? Would be possible that these increased radio waves penetrate metal too?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
  • #14
I'm certain that NASA is probably working on this problem. Could you imagine the scientific possibilities if we could map the caves of Mars? If there is any life left on Mars, it's underground. Europa is another place where seeing underground is of great interest.

Rock is simply very hard to penetrate. We can't even explore our own cave systems with radar, people still literally have to climb down them and explore.

It takes a lot of power to produce waves powerful enough to get through all that material. Do you know how the measure the depth of the ice shelves in Antarctica (which is nothing by comparison?) Dynamite.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
61K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K