Can We Truly Comprehend Dimensions Beyond the Eighth?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hootsh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comprehension of dimensions beyond the eighth, particularly in the context of theoretical physics and cosmology. Participants explore the implications of higher dimensions, their characteristics, and how they relate to our understanding of the universe, including concepts like the holographic principle and the nature of physical laws at different dimensional levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how predictions can be made about dimensions beyond the seventh, suggesting that these dimensions may be inherently in-explainable by current scientific understanding.
  • Others argue that dimensions do not have a specific order and that higher dimensions can be mathematically and conceptually dealt with, citing that physics often engages with 10 or 11-dimensional spaces.
  • There is a discussion about whether the beginning of the universe is tied to a specific dimension, with some participants expressing confusion about the implications of such a claim.
  • Some participants propose that dimensions are a means of describing physical phenomena, and that the nature of these dimensions can be experimentally investigated, although such experiments are challenging.
  • The holographic principle is introduced as a concept suggesting that our universe may have equivalent descriptions in different dimensional frameworks, leading to a discussion about the implications of living in a 2D versus a 3D universe.
  • One participant expresses difficulty in conceptualizing dimensions without incorporating time, leading to a reflection on how dimensions coexist and the nature of physical laws across them.
  • A later reply critiques the initial video shared in the thread, labeling it as a "crackpot video" and suggesting it does not belong in the forum, indicating a divergence in the perceived validity of the sources referenced.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement, particularly regarding the nature of dimensions and their implications for understanding the universe. While some concepts, like the holographic principle, are acknowledged as interesting, there is no consensus on the interpretations or implications of dimensions beyond the eighth.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and characteristics of higher dimensions, and there are unresolved questions about the relationship between dimensions and time, as well as the experimental feasibility of investigating higher dimensions.

hootsh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySBaYMESb8o

How can they predict anything after dimension 7? Especially the part where they go from dimension 8 to 9.

Isn't everything in that dimension supposed to be in-explainable by the our science and minds? And isn't dimension 8 a place of infinite starts? How can you go beyond the start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This video is an attempt to help you visualize extra dimensions. It isn't what the extra dimensions really are in any rigorous physical sense. In reality, there is no particular order to the dimensions and no distinction among them, except for the difference between space and time. (I'm speaking in general terms here -- in particular fundamental physical models there could be differences because of the way particular dimensions get wrapped up.) Nothing special happens at dimension 7, and things never become "inexplainable to our science and minds". In fact, a lot of physics right now is done dealing with 10 or 11-dimensional spaces, and mathematicians routinely deal with spaces of even higher dimensionality, even an infinite number of dimensions.
 
So you're saying the beginning of the universe did not necessarily happen in the 7th dimension? Or that dimensions are simply a way of describing stuff, like numbers or letters?
 
Last edited:
hootsh said:
So you're saying the beginning of the world did not necessarily happen in the 7th dimension?
To be honest, I'm not even sure what that means. But if you're saying that the beginning of the world happened in the 7th dimension, but not in the 6th or the 8th or the first, I would say yes, that is wrong.

Or that dimensions are simply a way of describing stuff, like numbers or letters?
Spacetime dimensions are a way of describing stuff, but they're more than just that. The question of whether space has 2 dimensions or 3 or 10 is a real physical question that can be answered experimentally. (At least in principle. The experiments to find out if there are more than 3 space dimensions are very hard to do.) The world would be a very different place if there were only two dimensions.
 
pmsrw3 said:
The world would be a very different place if there were only two dimensions.

Some physicists have put forth the holographic principle, which says the world has two spatial dimensions (if I'm understanding this correctly).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
 
True, and that's a very interesting idea. I guess I should have said that, if we live in a 2D universe, the laws of physics obeyed in that 2D universe are very different from those we are familiar with. According to the HP, the universe has equivalent descriptions as a 3D universe that obeys one set of physical laws, and a 2D universe (the boundary of the 3D universe) that obeys a different set of physical laws. But these laws are such that everything in one description maps to the other. No one knows how this would work with 3 and 2 dimensions, but Maldacena has produced an example of such a one-to-one correspondence between a 5D universe and its 4D boundary, which shows at least that the idea is not entirely crazy.

Very cool stuff.
 
By 'world' I meant the existence of physical laws as we know it; t=0 of the universe -- I'm sorry but imagining a t=0 kinda helps prevent my brain from exploding :D --.
But I think I understand what you mean.

I mistakenly made a relation between dimensions and time; automatically assuming that at t=0 the universe and all dimensions below seven existed. Its a bit of a logical enigma though, I am typically incapable of imagining anything without time, and the video stopped time after the 7th dimension my brain was like: "what the.. :rolleyes:".

If I understood things correctly, what you mean is that:
- All dimensions coexist without some dimensions having different characteristics of time than the others, time is measured the same in all dimensions.
- All dimensions obey the physical structure known to us like photons, electrons, gravity...etc.
- So in conclusion the string theory (and theories like 'dimensionless bits of data') could not mean that it is probable some universes exist with different physical principles from ours?

Oh my God man that Wikipedia page made my brain itch a bit haha! But its a really good read.

I'm really liking this stuff. Thanks for the help a lot.
 
hootsh said:
How can they predict anything after dimension 7? Especially the part where they go from dimension 8 to 9.

Isn't everything in that dimension supposed to be in-explainable by the our science and minds? And isn't dimension 8 a place of infinite starts? How can you go beyond the start?
When you embed a youtube video, the only thing you're supposed to type (or paste) between the tags is the code for the video. In other words, remove the = sign and everything to the left of it.

This is a crackpot video. I think the moderators would have deleted your post if they had seen the video. It also doesn't belong in the set theory and logic forum.
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K