Can You Solve This System of Differential Equations with Initial Values?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of differential equations with initial values. Participants explore various methods for reducing the system to a single equation and discuss the implications of their algebraic manipulations. The conversation includes technical reasoning and attempts to clarify concepts related to differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a substitution method to combine the equations but expresses uncertainty about its validity.
  • Another participant critiques the approach, suggesting that reducing the system to one equation in one unknown is more effective and provides a method to differentiate the first equation.
  • A subsequent reply reiterates the reduction to a second-order equation and suggests solving it for x(t), referencing characteristic equations.
  • Discussion includes a clarification about the notation used, specifically addressing a typo in the equation presented.
  • Some participants reflect on their reliance on examples from textbooks and express concerns about understanding the foundational concepts of differential equations.
  • There is a mention of the prerequisites for studying differential equations, including algebra and calculus, with one participant confirming their background in these subjects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to solve the system of equations, with no consensus reached on the most effective method. There is also a mix of confidence and uncertainty regarding the foundational knowledge necessary for tackling the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of clarity on certain algebraic manipulations and the implications of their approaches. There is also a mention of a typo that could lead to confusion in the equations presented.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying differential equations, particularly those seeking clarification on solving systems of equations and the underlying concepts required for understanding the material.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\begin{array}{rr}
x' & = -x - 4y\\
y' & = 3x - 2y
\end{array}$
and initial values are
$x(0) = 20\quad y(0) = 20$
so since $x=-x'-4y$
then
$y'=3(-x'-4y)-2y=-3x'-12y-2y=-3x'-14y$
just seeing if this combined eq is ok...i think y also could have been substituted
$4y=-x-x'$ or $y=-\dfrac{x}{4}-\dfrac{x'}{4}$
then
$y'=-3x'+\dfrac{7x}{2}-\dfrac{7x'}{2}$

not that sure :unsure:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The algebra is correct but I don't know why you did that. You have one equation in both x' and y' but that does not help.

I am sure that, in algebra, you learned that to solve two equations in two unknowns you reduce to one equation in one unknown. Here, you can do that by differentiating the first equation again:
x''= -x'- 4y'. The second equation tells us that y'= 3x- 2y so x''= -x- 4(3x- 2y)= -13x+ 8y.

And we can rewrite x'= -x- 4y as 4y= -x'- x so that x''= -13x- 2(-x'- x)= 2x'- 11x or x''- 2x'+11X= 0.

Now solve that for x(t).
 
Last edited:
Country Boy said:
And we can rewrite x'= -x- 4y as 4y= -x'- x so that x''= -13x- 2(-x'- x)= 2x'- 11x or x''- 2x'+11x= 0.
Now solve that for x(t).
are you suggesting to rewrite
$x''- 2x'+11x= 0$ as $r^2-2r+11=0$
thus giving
$r=1+\sqrt{10}i,\quad r=1-\sqrt{10}i$

at lease i saw something like this is some examples
 
You know, from differential Calculus, that the derivative of $e^{rx}$ is $re^{rx}$, a constant times the original function, so it is natural to look for such functions as solutions to equations like this, linear equations with constant coefficients where the various derivatives must cancel.

If $x(t)= e^{rt}$ then $x'(t)= re^{rt}$ and $x''(t)= r^2e^{rt}$ so that $x''- 2x'+ 11X= 0$ becomes $r^2e^{rt}- 2re^{rt}+ 11e^{rt}= (r^2- 2r+11)e^{rt}= 0$. And since $e^{rt}$ is never 0, we must have $r^2- 2r+ 11= 05.

Surely you were taught that in an introductory Differential Equations course?
 
for this topic I have only been able to look at examples in books,...
so I depend heavily on forums for help

why do have a capitol X
 
karush said:
for this topic I have only been able to look at examples in books,...
so I depend heavily on forums for help
I hope you are reading the books to learn the basic concepts and NOT just looking at examples!

why do have a capitol X
The X was a typo. It should have been x''- 2x'+ 11x= 0.
 
both actually but they assume a lot
 
Yes, "Differential Equations" is fairly deep mathematics and requires a lot of prerequisites- largely algebra and Calculus. Have you passed algebra and Calculus courses?
 
yes
i took de
last year but it was all matrix
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K