MHB Can you solve this week's production cost optimization problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The production cost optimization problem involves minimizing the cost function C(x,y)=5x^2+2xy+3y^2+800, subject to the constraint x+y=39. Participants utilized various mathematical methods, including Lagrange multipliers and single variable calculus, to find the optimal production levels of x and y. The correct solutions were provided by several contributors, demonstrating different approaches to the problem. The discussion highlights the importance of applying calculus techniques in cost optimization scenarios. The final answers reveal the production levels that minimize costs and the corresponding total cost.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Thanks to those who participated in last week's POTW! Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem: A company incurs costs of $C(x,y)=5x^2+2xy+3y^2+800$ (in thousands of dollars) when it produces $x$ thousand units of one product and $y$ thousand units of another. Its production capacity is such that $x+y=39$. At what production levels will the company's costs be minimized? What will be the corresponding total cost?

-----

Suggestion:

Solve this using the method of Lagrange multipliers.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by Ackbach, Bacterius, BAdhi, MarkFL, and Sudharaka. MarkFL showed it using Lagrange multipliers (and regular algebra), Sudharaka showed it using Lagrange multipliers as well, and everyone else used single variable calculus. You can find MarkFL's answer below (for the Lagrange multiplier and algebra solution):

We are given the objective function:

$\displaystyle C(x,y)=5x^2+2xy+3y^2+800$subject to the constraint:$\displaystyle g(x,y)=x+y-39=0$Using the theorem of Lagrange, we obtain the system:(1) $\displaystyle 10x+2y=\lambda$(2) $\displaystyle 2x+6y=\lambda$These equations imply:$\displaystyle y=2x$Substituting for $\displaystyle y$ into the constraint, there results:$\displaystyle x=13\,\therefore\,y=26$Hence, the minimum cost in thousands of dollars at the given production level is:$\displaystyle C(13,26)=4349$Alternate solution without calculus:Substitute for $\displaystyle y$ using the constraint into the objective function to obtain:$\displaystyle C(x)=6x^2-156x+5363$The minimum point, i.e., the vertex, lies on the axis of symmetry, given by:$\displaystyle x=-\frac{-156}{12}=13$Hence, the minimum cost in thousands of dollars at the given production level is:$\displaystyle C(13)=4349$

Here's Bacterius' solution using single variable calculus:

As $x + y = 39$, there is only one degree of freedom, so the cost can be rewritten in a single variable:

$C(x, y) = C(x) = 5x^2 + 2x(39 - x) + 3(39 - x)^2 + 800 = 6x^2 - 156x + 5363$Which is minimized by:$C'(x) = 12x - 156 \implies x = 13 \iff y = 26$Hence the production levels which minimize the company's costs are $x = 13$ and $y = 26$, with a total cost of $C(13, 26) = 4349$ (thousands of dollars).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K