Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Carly Fiorina: McCain/Palin couldn't run a corporation

  1. Sep 16, 2008 #1

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/09/fiorina_flubs_r.html

    Which would be worse: To let her go or to keep her? Either way, this was a very bad day for McCain and I suspect that we won't be seeing much more of Fiorina.
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 16, 2008 #2
    Maybe McPalin will toss focus back to Wright?
     
  4. Sep 16, 2008 #3

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    All I can note is that Carly is knowledgeable about not being able to run a corporation.

    What corporation is Carly running now?
     
  5. Sep 16, 2008 #4
    wow, I hope she is hiding in a basement closet right now, horrible mistake lol
     
  6. Sep 16, 2008 #5
    Worse would be Joe Lieberman IMHO.

    I believe that a president and vice president should have their undivided allegiance to the United States and be fully committed to serve its interests above the interests of all other nations.

    I have my doubts in this respect about Joe Lieberman, I think he would have no qualms to bring physical or economic harm or even destruction to the USA if it would help Israel.
     
  7. Sep 16, 2008 #6

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Poor Carly, after being shamefully ousted from HP after almost destroying it, she turns up with McCain. The poor woman has nowhere left to go.
     
  8. Sep 16, 2008 #7

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Maybe Nader needs help. The poor guy is having conversations with his parrot. :rofl:
    https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=256843
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2008
  9. Sep 16, 2008 #8

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Lieberman and allegiance after his Republican convention performance apparently aren't on speaking terms.

    Forget his loyalty to Israel. I no longer know what the man believes in other than his own self interest.
     
  10. Sep 16, 2008 #9

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Lieberman who? Is that a cartoon character?
     
  11. Sep 17, 2008 #10

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think it is noteworthy that Fiorina made a huge mistake politically, but she clearly meant what she said. I wonder how this is going to play in the corporate world.
     
  12. Sep 17, 2008 #11

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    It's not like corporate America is clamoring for the services of the overpriced Fiorina.
     
  13. Sep 17, 2008 #12

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I have no idea what her reputation is in the corporate world. These CEOs seem to escape accountablity for their failures. In fact they usually receive huge rewards for them. But what strikes me most is that many Republicans essentially want a CEO, not a President. In fact Bush has been call America's CEO. Given this mentality, how does it spin when one of their own, and a person close to McCain, declares him to to be unqualified?

    She can say all she wants about Obama, but she doesn't even know him.
     
  14. Sep 17, 2008 #13

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Though there is precious little actual analysis of the incident in this thread, this makes a decent jumping-off point:
    There are several basic points to be gleaned from the incident:

    1. She meant what she said.
    2. She made a political mistake.
    3. By making the political mistake, she proved the corollary to her statement (CEOs don't necessarily make good politicians).
    4. She's probably right!

    Did you hear her snicker when she answered the first time? The implied answer is 'Heh - yeah, right :rolleyes: Of course not!' But politicians can't say things like that because people react to the delivery without actually examining the statement.

    So while politically it is a mistake, I wish people in the media, the general public, and even in politics forums on otherwise scholarly sites could actually examine and take in such statements. I'm not naive enough to believe it possible, but this is the reason that political campaigns are reduced to mere marketing campaigns. There is no room for depth when people are driven by knee-jerk emotional reaction.
    That's a label Democrats use to ridicule him, not a Republican position. Nevertheless, he is an MBA and some people value that. Cynically, I'd say that the primary function of Presidents and today's stereotypical CEO's are identical (keeping their numbers up as long as they can, until they escape), but to me that makes it a bad idea to have someone who thinks like a CEO in such offices. What you really want is the founder-owner type. The type who treats his company like his baby/family and takes a personal interest in its success.

    The thing about the Presidency is that no one is ever really qualified for it. There is far too much to know. That's what makes appointing good advisers and listening to them so important. And that irked me about the last two presidents: Clinton picked like-minded sycophants. Bush picked high profile experts - and then ignored them.
     
  15. Sep 17, 2008 #14

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Nor do I, nor do you - but we all do. That's politics.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Carly Fiorina: McCain/Palin couldn't run a corporation
Loading...