I Chernoff Bounds for Independent Bernoulli Sums

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
TL;DR Summary
What is wrong with this proof? Can you notice that? or I am wrong. In my opinion, in the R.H.S. of inequality (3.2), the index of 'e' must be positive if we use the proof. I also want to know how to derive the proof of inequality(3.3)? Author said it is similar to that of (3.2). But I don't understand that.
Chernoffbounds proof.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cleared my doubt taking suitable guidelines from other statistician on Internet.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top