Chew's Bootstrap Theory - August 1984

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bootstrap
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Chew's Bootstrap Theory, as discussed in the forum, is rooted in a narrative reading from August 1984, accessible via SLAC's SPIRES database. Reilly Atkinson highlights the historical significance of this theory, noting its popularity among physicists in the 1960s. Despite its initial promise, the rise of quark theory ultimately overshadowed bootstrap physics, which struggled to accommodate elementary particles. This discussion underscores the pivotal shift in particle physics from bootstrap models to quark-centric frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Chew's Bootstrap Theory
  • Familiarity with quark theory in particle physics
  • Knowledge of historical context in theoretical physics
  • Access to academic resources like SLAC's SPIRES database
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Chew's Bootstrap Theory on modern physics
  • Explore the transition from bootstrap models to quark theory
  • Study the historical papers published on bootstrap and dispersion theory
  • Investigate current applications of bootstrap concepts in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, historians of science, and students of theoretical physics seeking to understand the evolution of particle physics theories and the impact of Chew's Bootstrap Theory.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
I have found a narrative reading of bootstrap theory: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?key=1264621 . It is dated August 1984.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
arivero -- Thanks for the reference. I was a proponent of Chew's Bootstrap approach, as many were in the 1960s, and published a few bootstrap/dispersion theory papers. But, quarks ruled the day, and bootstrap physics did not like elementary particles.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
994
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K