Is There Another Way to Rearrange This Formula for ILS Glideslope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcalves
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a formula used to calculate the depth of modulation (DDM) in the context of the Instrument Landing System (ILS) glideslope. The original poster seeks clarification on rearranging the formula to solve for the output voltage after attenuation (E2) given the input voltage (E1) and the decibel level (db).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the notation used in the formula, particularly the term "log^-1" and its interpretation as the inverse function of logarithm. There are attempts to clarify how to rearrange the formula to isolate E2, with some participants questioning the validity of the calculations and the implications of using logarithmic functions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the mathematical notation and the process of using antilogarithms. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly input the calculations into a calculator, with some participants confirming successful results after clarifying the use of the antilog function.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions regarding the constraints of the logarithmic function, particularly the requirement for its argument to be positive, which raises questions about the validity of certain values in the context of the problem.

mcalves
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello all, this is a formula that calculates DDM (depth of modulation) at certain outputs of the ILS's Glideslope. I posted this question some time ago but I think I left out some important details. Any help is really appreciated.


This is basic info on the ILS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_Landing_System

db = 20log(E1/E2)

E1 is the input voltage before attenuation
E2 is the output voltage after attenuation

E1 and db seems like is always given. E2 is what needs to be solved.

My course book rearranges the formula to this: E2 = E1log-1(db/20)

-that makes NO sense to me. Log to negative power - or the reciprical?

this is one of the examples they have:

db = -3
E1 = .155

E2 = .155log-1(-3/20) = 0.109

more examples:

2.5log-1(-3/20) = 1.77

1.0log-1(-3/20) = 0.707

.494log-1(-3/20) = 0.342

Is there another way to rearrange the formula that makes sense?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They mean by log^(-1) the inverse function of log. I'll admit, that's a funny notation. But if you are dealing with base 10 logs, then log^(-1)(x)=10^x. Since log(10^x)=x.
 
Dick, I'm not real big on math, I am not sure what you mean.

Basically

db = 20log(E1/E2)

db = -3
E1 = .155

How would you solve for E2
 
by the way yes, the way its written in the book its

log^-1

thanks
 
mcalves said:
Dick, I'm not real big on math, I am not sure what you mean.

Basically

db = 20log(E1/E2)

db = -3
E1 = .155

How would you solve for E2

I would write db/20=log(E1/E2), then take 10 to the power of both sides (this is log^(-1)). So 10^(db/20)=E1/E2.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is Antilog. If the base is 10, then you will find Antilogs for them in logarithmic tables. Base e can be converted into 10 if necessary (by multiplying roughly with 2.303).

Regards,
Sleek.
 
If it's talking about decibels, then the base of the log is 10.
 
So take this example that's in the book:

E2 = .155log^-1(-3/20) = 0.109

The answer is already given, but how would I enter this in the calculator? Every way I tried has yielded a syntex or math error.

thanks in advance
 
mcalves said:
So take this example that's in the book:

E2 = .155log^-1(-3/20) = 0.109

The answer is already given, but how would I enter this in the calculator? Every way I tried has yielded a syntex or math error.

thanks in advance
The argument of a logarithm must be positive, so in this case E2 is undefined.
 
  • #10
Hootenanny said:
The argument of a logarithm must be positive, so in this case E2 is undefined.

It's NOT a log, it's an antilog. On the calculator I'm looking at above the 'log' key is a second function labelled 10^x. That's the 'antilog'.
 
  • #11
okay using the antilog key finally worked. I get that 0.109 answer above with no errors.

Thanks Dick, Sleek, and Hootenanny for responding. Much appreciated!
 
  • #12
Dick said:
It's NOT a log, it's an antilog. On the calculator I'm looking at above the 'log' key is a second function labelled 10^x. That's the 'antilog'.
Indeed 10^x gives the correct result, I've never seen that notation before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K