Choosing a Dissertation Committee: Combination Permutation Dilemma

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a combinatorial problem involving the selection of a dissertation committee for a graduate student in theoretical/mathematical physics. Participants explore how to calculate the number of ways to choose five committee members, given specific constraints regarding the chair's role and the mix of mathematicians and physicists.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the formula 8C3 to calculate combinations, leading to a discussion about whether to consider arrangements or combinations.
  • Another participant proposes that the first position must be filled by one of the three mathematicians, followed by selecting from the remaining members.
  • There is uncertainty about whether to start counting from 7 or 5 remaining members after selecting the chair.
  • Participants discuss the need to account for the order of selection and whether it affects the total number of combinations.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how to modify their calculations to account for the fact that order does not matter in this context.
  • Another participant clarifies that the committee's composition remains the same regardless of the order of selection, reinforcing the idea that order does not matter.
  • There is a correction regarding the number of members to choose from, with a later participant confirming the correct binomial coefficient to use.
  • Participants question whether the formula accounts for multiple mathematicians on the committee and discuss how to factor this into their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to choose a mathematician as the chair and the approach to calculating combinations, but there is still some uncertainty regarding the specifics of the calculations and the implications of order in their selections. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the final count of combinations and the assumptions about the committee composition.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions underlying their calculations, particularly regarding the treatment of order in combinations and the implications of having multiple mathematicians on the committee.

elove
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am in a group we cannot agree on how to answer the following word problem...

"Let me tell you a little dirty secret about the mutual dislike between mathematicians and physicists. It can escalate into a full blown war if diplomacy is not attempted properly.

It happens that a graduate student in theoretical/mathematical physics is looking for five members of his dissertation committee. He has been working closely with three professors in the mathematics department, and 5 professors in the physics department on his dissertation research.

Now comes the monkey wrench.

The mathematics department demands that the chair of the dissertation committee must be a mathematician in order to keep the physicists in check. What? How arrogant! But, there is no other choice if a dissertation committee has to be assembled in time. As usual, physicists have to swallow their pride in order to keep peace. Yes, they are just a bunch of you know what (click on the link ) in the mathematics department!

For comic relief, can you figure out how may ways can this hapless graduate student can choose among his beloved professors if the chair of the committee must be a mathematician, and the rest of the committee can be a mix of mathematicians and physicists?"

one of the group members suggested this formula:

8C3 = 8! / (8 - 5)! x 5!

40,320 / 5! x 3!

40,320 / 120 x 6

40,320 / 720

56

but then another member said no that we need to calculate all the 4-man and 3-man combinations and add them all together

here is what i thought:

__ x__ x__ x__ x__ x each space represents a position on the committee

the chair of the committee must be a mathematician and there are only 3 options. so...

3 x __ x__ x__ x__ then the rest of the spaces represents the possible number of people to fill that position

3 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 i started at 7 because 1 of the mathematicians is out

this = 2,520

8! / 2,520 = 16 but now that I've typed this all out 16 sounds too low maybe?

HELP! we can't agree and are WAY off
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi elove,

I agree that the first slot would be 3 because there are 3 possible choices for the chair. Then the question is how many ways can you arrange the remaining members in a group of 4, where order doesn't matter?
 
okay so I seem to be on the right track...the first ___ is 3 and since there are 4 more positions I started with 7 since there are 7 out of 8 possibilities left.

so 3 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 = 2,520

BUT maybe you start at 5? and not 7? maybe start with 5 since I am giving 3 possibilities out of 8.

3 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 = 360

that seems like too many combinations to be correct.
 
elove said:
...the first ___ is 3 and since there are 4 more positions I started with 7 since there are 7 out of 8 possibilities left.

so 3 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 = 2,520...

You are on the right track here...and what you have can be written as:

$$N=3\frac{7!}{3!}=3\cdot\,_{7}{P}_{3}$$

However, you have made the order of the remaining 4 members matter (permutations), and as Jameson pointed out, order doesn't matter, so how can you modify your formula so that order doesn't matter?
 
ahhh, I see what you are saying.

Geez, I haven't taken statistics since high school.

I don't know how to make the order not matter. My online class group is not helping.
 
elove said:
ahhh, I see what you are saying.

Geez, I haven't taken statistics since high school.

I don't know how to make the order not matter. My online class group is not helping.

How many ways can we order the 4 remaining members of the committee? If we can figure out how many ways to order 4 distinct objects, and divide our result by this number, then instead of finding the permutations of 7 things taken 4 at a time, we can find the number of ways of choosing 4 things from 7...and being able to find the number of ways to choose $r$ from $n$ is very useful in statistics/probability. :)
 
ok so

n! / r! (n-r)!

n = 7
r = 4

7! / (4! x (7 - 4)!))

7! / (4! x 3!)

5,040 / 24 x 6

5,040 / 144

= 35

but is this considering the fact that more than one mathematician can be on the committee?

to me it seems as though this formula only factors one mathematician being on the committee.

so do i 35 x 3 (to factor the other mathematicians?)
 
Yes, you have it exactly right, you want:

$$N=3{7 \choose 4}=3\cdot\frac{7!}{4!(7-4)!}=105$$
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, you have it exactly right, you want:

$$N=3{7 \choose 3}=3\cdot\frac{7!}{3!(7-3)!}=105$$

Thank you!
 
  • #10
elove said:
Thank you!

I have corrected my post (post #8)...I inadvertently wrote the wrong number being chose from 7, however because of the symmetry of the binomial coefficients, the end result was still correct.

The symmetry I am referring to is:

$${n \choose r}={n \choose n-r}$$
 
  • #11
i was just about to ask that... thank you for clarifying. r = 4, not 3. but the end result is still the same.
 
  • #12
but how do I know that order doesn't matter?

if order does matter than the final answer would be more than 105?

If I gave them letters to represent members...

ABCDE

is the same as

BACDE - its the same members, just a different order of the combination.

if order mattered this is 2 possible committees, if order doesn't matter this is just 1 possible committee made up of the same members.

I am confident in the formula you guided me to but I am second guessing the assumption that order doesn't matter.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Yes, if we let C be the committee chair, and the W, X, Y, Z be the other four committee members, then we see that:

CWXYZ

is the same as:

CZYXW

We only need be concerned with the fact that there are 5 members, one of which is the chair. The order in which they are picked doesn't matter, so long as we pick the chair first to make certain we have a mathematician to choose for that position. It is the same committee regardless of the order in which the remaining 4 members are chosen. If we were to give a title to each member, then order would matter.
 
  • #14
MarkFL said:
Yes, if we let C be the committee chair, and the W, X, Y, Z be the other four committee members, then we see that:

CWXYZ

is the same as:

CZYXW

We only need be concerned with the fact that there are 5 members, one of which is the chair. The order in which they are picked doesn't matter, so long as we pick the chair first to make certain we have a mathematician to choose for that position. It is the same committee regardless of the order in which the remaining 4 members are chosen. If we were to give a title to each member, then order would matter.

okay, I follow now. I agree and was editing my last post as you responded. I agree now that order does not matter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K