Civil rights lose big fight to vacation time

  • News
  • Thread starter Gokul43201
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Civil Time
In summary, the conversation discusses the decision to address executive power and civil rights legislation on a Friday evening and the possible motivations behind it. The concern is raised that the White House may be using fear tactics to pressure Congress into giving up liberties for security. This is in the context of Congress already granting the White House more leeway with the Patriot Act in 2002. The conversation also touches on the potential impact on morale in Congress and the history of senators caving to political pressure.
  • #1
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,220
24
Why exactly was it so necessary to decide the future of executive power and civil rights legislation over a hasty friday evening?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/03/AR2007080302296.html?hpid=topnews

Is it just that we're approaching election season, and the Dems don't want to appear to be weak on "terror"? In my opinion, the only sense in which this White House is strong on terror is in their ability to terrorize the people and their representatives into giving up a little liberty to gain a little security. That one should give up the checks provided by the Judiciary to Gonzales-like-scum that prowl the executive, is scary, if not laughable, given the context.

And this is all after Congress gifted this White House the slack it demanded out of FISA, in http://www.npr.org/news/specials/patriotact/patriotactdeal.html#issue4 (of course, the White House never had any intention of using this leeway, as it instead decided to entirely bypass FISA)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Morale must be sinking in Congress.

In 2002, Senators caved because they wanted to stay in Congress and were afraid a vote against the Iraq invasion would result in them leaving.

In 2007, Senators caved because they wanted to leave Congress and were afraid a vote against surveillance without FISA oversight would force them to stay.

At least the House in session today. I wonder what they're talking about today.
 
  • #3


I cannot comment on the political motivations behind the decision to address executive power and civil rights legislation on a Friday evening. However, I can speak to the importance of these issues and the potential consequences of hasty decision-making.

Civil rights are essential for maintaining a fair and just society. Any decision that affects them should be carefully considered and thoroughly debated, rather than rushed through on a Friday evening. Executive power is also a crucial issue, as it determines the extent of authority and control that the government has over its citizens. Any changes to executive power should be carefully evaluated and debated in order to ensure that the balance of power is maintained and the rights of citizens are protected.

Hasty decision-making can have serious consequences, particularly when it comes to issues as significant as civil rights and executive power. Rushed decisions may not adequately consider all perspectives and potential consequences, leading to unintended and negative outcomes. It is important for our government leaders to take the time to thoroughly consider and debate these issues, rather than making quick decisions for the sake of political expediency.

Furthermore, it is concerning that the White House has been given more leeway with FISA, potentially compromising the checks and balances in place to protect citizens' rights. This is a reminder of the importance of carefully considering and debating any changes to legislation, rather than blindly giving in to demands for more power.

In conclusion, as a scientist, I believe it is crucial for our government to carefully consider and debate any decisions related to civil rights and executive power, rather than rushing through them on a Friday evening. The future of our society and the protection of our citizens' rights depend on it.
 

1. What exactly does it mean that civil rights lost a fight to vacation time?

Civil rights losing a fight to vacation time means that there has been a conflict or competition between the two concepts, and vacation time emerged as the dominant or preferred choice. It could refer to a specific incident or situation where vacation time was prioritized over civil rights.

2. How does vacation time affect civil rights?

Vacation time can affect civil rights in several ways. For example, if employees are not given equal vacation time based on their race, gender, or other protected characteristics, it can be considered a violation of civil rights. Additionally, if vacation time is used as a way to discriminate against certain groups or deny them their rights, it can also have a negative impact on civil rights.

3. What are some potential consequences of civil rights losing to vacation time?

The consequences of civil rights losing to vacation time can vary depending on the specific situation. In general, it can lead to unequal treatment and opportunities for certain groups, perpetuation of discrimination and inequality, and erosion of fundamental rights and freedoms.

4. Is this a common issue in society?

It is difficult to determine if this is a common issue in society as it can depend on various factors such as location, industry, and individual experiences. However, there have been instances where vacation time has clashed with civil rights, particularly in the workplace, leading to legal battles and public debates.

5. What can be done to prevent civil rights from losing to vacation time?

To prevent civil rights from losing to vacation time, it is important to educate individuals and organizations about the importance of equal treatment and opportunities for all. Employers should also have policies in place that promote fairness and non-discrimination in terms of vacation time and other benefits. Additionally, advocating for stronger civil rights laws and enforcement can also help prevent such situations from arising in the future.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top