Civilizations in other galaxies?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxies
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the probability of civilizations existing in other galaxies, exploring the implications of the vast number of galaxies and the conditions necessary for life and civilization to develop. Participants examine the challenges of estimating this probability, referencing concepts like the Drake equation and the fragility of intelligent life.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that with 100 billion galaxies, it seems likely that at least one other civilization exists, though they acknowledge the lack of physical evidence.
  • Others highlight the long timeline required for life to evolve into civilization, citing Earth's history and significant events like the extinction of the dinosaurs as crucial factors.
  • One participant mentions the Drake equation as a tool for estimating the number of civilizations, noting that the results depend heavily on the input values used.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes the rarity of civilization, suggesting that while life may be common, intelligent life is fragile and vulnerable to catastrophic events.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of current radio surveys, with some arguing that the absence of detected signals does not rule out the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of our ability to detect signals from other civilizations, suggesting that current technology may not be sufficient to find evidence of alien life.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the probability of extraterrestrial civilizations, with no consensus reached. Some agree on the utility of the Drake equation, while others question the assumptions behind it and the implications of current observational evidence.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the uncertainty surrounding abiogenesis and the factors influencing the development of intelligent life, as well as the limitations of current observational methods in detecting extraterrestrial signals.

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
How probable is this?

100 Billion galaxies, there has to be at least one other civilization out there, no?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Holocene said:
How probable is this?

100 Billion galaxies, there has to be at least one other civilization out there, no?

Probability of life seems high, but we can't be certain without physical evidence. To go from life to civilization appears to take a long time. Life started on Earth arround 3.5 billiuon years ago, multicellular life starte around 550 million years ago. Homo sapiens started around 150 thousand years ago. Civilization began (say defined by the invention of writing) around 5500 years ago. Also the whole process seemed to require a succession of accidents, like the disappearance of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, which is believed to have resulted from a major catastrophic extraterrestial impact. If the dinosaurs hadn't been wiped out, mammals wouldn't have had much chance to evolve as they did.
 
This is something that is very very very hard to estimate, especially because we know so little about abiogenesis. The Drake equation is the best estimation that I know of.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation
 
I am agree with friend nicksauce that the Drake equation is the best estimation that we know.For example if we put the numbers 1,2,3..in the Drake equation the number of other civilizations would be 20.IF we put bigger number more ''crazy'' the number of other civilization would be 100.000!But all of those numbers are depends on the fractions of the Drake equation.
 
To start with i do not want to contemplate infinite possibilities, (think about it) for this reason i do not think that everything is possible, there has to be a a set number of posssibilites, if you think my reasoning strange then say hello to the goat laying in bed next to you.
 
Civilization, as we know it, is extraordinarily rare for reasons we do not fully understand. Radio surveys are the evidence [no alien versions of 'I love Lucy' have yet been detected]. The sophistication of modern radio telescopes has virtually ruled out artificial EM sources within our galaxy. The universe is an incredibly inhospitable place to live. Cataclysmic events occur with disturbing regularity and life, especially intelligent life, is incredibly vulnerable to such events. We have only been literate here on Earth [a prerequisite for truly intelligent life forms] for about 6000 years. That is an incredibly tiny slice of time in the history of the universe. I don't think life is rare, merely fragile.
 
Last edited:
Chronos said:
Radio surveys are the evidence [no alien versions of 'I love Lucy' have yet been detected]. The sophistication of modern radio telescopes has virtually ruled out artificial EM sources within our galaxy.

My understanding is that the strongest routine radio signals generated on Earth could only be detected a few light years away by radio telescopes such as ones we have today. In other words, we are not capable of detecting "I Love Lucy" from another star system, so the fact that we have not done so does not rule out their existence.

It is also my understanding that we have only surveyed a relatively small number of stars at a small number of frequencies. I think it is premature to rule out alien life in our galaxy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
894
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K