Clutch stiffness and hysteresis - Role in gearbox NVH

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between clutch stiffness, hysteresis, and their roles in causing rattling noises in automobile gearboxes. Participants explore the implications of these factors on noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) in the context of automotive engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether higher clutch stiffness leads to less rattling, suggesting that while higher stiffness may reduce relative displacement, it could also cause springs to vibrate after absorbing fluctuating forces.
  • Another participant proposes that rattling could be caused by rapid impacts due to lash in the gears, excited by torsional vibrations from the engine, and compares the clutch's function to that of a car's suspension.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the rattling noise might be more akin to "clutch chatter," which is typically associated with misalignment or worn components, rather than lash in the gears.
  • One participant describes gear rattle as sounding similar to a worn release bearing but with a distinct 'clacky' quality, and discusses the conditions under which gear rattle occurs.
  • Another participant raises the concept of 'stick-slip' behavior in relation to clutch chatter, questioning if it manifests as a jerking motion.
  • A request for further reading on clutch hysteresis indicates an interest in deepening understanding of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the causes of rattling noises, with some attributing it to clutch stiffness and hysteresis, while others suggest it may relate to gear lash or component wear. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of terms like "rattle" and "chatter," as well as the subjective nature of noise descriptions. The relationship between clutch characteristics and NVH is complex and not fully explored in the conversation.

Who May Find This Useful

Automotive engineers, mechanical engineers, and students interested in noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) in vehicle design may find this discussion relevant.

k.udhay
Messages
167
Reaction score
13
Hi,
There is a rattling noise in one of the automobile passenger car gearboxes that we designed. After few experiments and observations, it was found that the noise is because of incorrect clutch stiffness and hysteresis behavior. I have got some fundamental questions about both:
1. Clutch stiffness Vs rattling:
  • I understand that higher the stiffness of clutch, lower the relative displacement between crank shaft and transmission shaft for a particular torque.
  • All infiltrated fluctuations to the clutch will be absorbed to an extent. And this is done by the springs in the clutch. But, won't the springs start vibrating (as it is an elastic body and not a dampening member) after they absorb this fluctuating forces? What is better for rattling - High stiffness clutches or low stiffness clutches?
2. Clutch hysteresis Vs rattling:
  • The attachment shows the hysteresis values of the clutch that I am discussing here about.
  • The unit is NM. What exactly does this hysteresis torque physically mean?
  • How is hysteresis responsible for gearbox rattle?
Thanks a lot!
 

Attachments

  • clutch - 1.JPG
    clutch - 1.JPG
    25.2 KB · Views: 720
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vinayak
I've turned a lot of wrenches on a lot of cars, but I've never even heard of the stuff that you're talking about. To me, a rattling sound would indicate a loose part or a worn bearing. Sorry.
 
It's not anything worn. But the OPs is a tricky question, as it's fairly high level NVH. It's going to be very hard to give a detailed answer.

Rattle is caused by rapid impacts due to lash in the gears. Excited by the torsional vibration of an engine.

A sprung clutch allows a certain degree of 'free play' when torque is not being transmitted. Eg clutch up in N at idle.

Edit. Its probably easier to use a linear analogue. Think of a car suspension.

The torque transfer (ie opening the throttle) is like large hills. The entire car moves over them together. So the springs don't do much.

Torsional vibrations are a rough road surface. If you had no suspension then you would feel all the little bumps. Adding a spring to a clutch isolates the driveline from TV like suspension springs isolates you from those little bumps in the road. It's a bit of a butchered explanation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: k.udhay, Danger and Greg Bernhardt
xxChrisxx said:
It's a bit of a butchered explanation.
Not bad, considering the subject matter. The way you describe it, though, it sounds more like clutch "chatter" that we used to experience in my day. That was caused by either misalignment, a bad pilot or throwout bearing, or worn disk material. I've never heard anything like that caused by lash, but maybe that's just because I've never encountered lash. It only occurred during engagement/disengagement. The impression that I got from the OP was that the phenomenon in question was constant. Can you provide a touch more explanation, without getting into math?
 
It's fairly difficult to distinguish subtleties between similar noises using subjective phrases. Gear rattle sounds sort of similar to a knackered release bearing, but a bit more 'clacky'.

The loose gears sit on the needle bearings, when the small torque changes due to torsional vibration exceed the drag in the bearings then the gear is free to rotate. This is when you have a risk of gear rattle.

As you describe clutch 'chatter' only occurring during engagement and disengagement. Does it come across as a jerking? As it sounds similar to what we would describe as 'stick-slip'.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: k.udhay
xxChrisxx said:
Gear rattle sounds sort of similar to a knackered release bearing, but a bit more 'clacky'.
Non-gearheads might find it hard to believe, but that makes perfect sense to me.

xxChrisxx said:
Does it come across as a jerking?
Close, but not exactly. More like sliding down a washboard on your ass.

xxChrisxx said:
what we would describe as 'stick-slip'
Maybe. I'm not familiar with all Brit terminology since we use a combination of that and Yank-speak. For instance, we usually refer to the rear compartment as a "trunk", but sometimes it's the "boot". A vertical conveyor can be a "lift" or an "elevator" depending upon what time of day it is or how much one has had to eat. :D In other matters, we use one or the other pretty exclusively (or French of course; we're a bilingual nation).
 
Thanks, xxChrisxx... Can you suggest me a book or paper that speaks more detailed about this? I am now more curious to understand this clutch hysteresis. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vinayak

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K