- #1
- 3,988
- 48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".
I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.14 ... ...
Proposition 4.2.14 reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8237
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8235
In the above proof by Bland we read the following:
"... ... Since \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) is a simple R-module, \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) is artinian and noetherian ... ...
Can someone please explain why \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) being a simple R-module implies that \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) is artinian and noetherian ... ... ?
Peter
I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.14 ... ...
Proposition 4.2.14 reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8237
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8235
In the above proof by Bland we read the following:
"... ... Since \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) is a simple R-module, \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) is artinian and noetherian ... ...
Can someone please explain why \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) being a simple R-module implies that \(\displaystyle M / M_1\) is artinian and noetherian ... ... ?
Peter
Last edited: