Consciousness and the measurement problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between consciousness and the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, exploring whether consciousness plays a role in wave function collapse. It includes references to specific research and philosophical implications, as well as differing opinions on the validity of certain studies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of linking consciousness to wave function collapse, suggesting that without a means to measure consciousness, such connections cannot be proven.
  • Others propose that the discussion might be more appropriate in philosophical or skeptical contexts rather than a physics forum.
  • A participant notes that the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab (PEAR) is defunct and was not taken seriously, implying skepticism about its findings.
  • There is a reference to historical debates in quantum mechanics, highlighting the conflict between dynamic principles and the postulate of collapse, as articulated by David Albert.
  • Some astrophysicists suggest that the act of observation may collapse the wave function of the observer rather than that of the observed system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the legitimacy of the connection between consciousness and quantum measurement, with no consensus reached on the topic. Some participants are skeptical of the research mentioned, while others are open to exploring the implications.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of consciousness and measurement, as well as the implications of the historical debates in quantum mechanics. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives without definitive conclusions.

Viva-Diva
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Consciousness and "the measurement problem"

Hello All,

Just a reminder that I am not a physicist...but for those who closed my thread on power of the mind :-(((( , pleae share your views on

this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_causes_collapse

and this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princeton_Engineering_Anomalies_Research_Lab

If there is a lab at Priceton University studing this, why do you all think it is bull? Bear with me, I am just trying to understand.

Thanks to all in advance!
Viva-Diva
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Viva-Diva said:
Hello All,

Just a reminder that I am not a physicist...but for those who closed my thread on power of the mind :-(((( , pleae share your views on

this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_causes_collapse

and this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princeton_Engineering_Anomalies_Research_Lab

If there is a lab at Priceton University studing this, why do you all think it is bull? Bear with me, I am just trying to understand.

Thanks to all in advance!
Viva-Diva

Unless you are able to measure consciousness by some instrument you can't prove any connection between consciousness and wave function collapse. Thus you will not find answers to your questions in the physics department.
 
maybe it should have been in the 'philosophy' or 'Scepticism and debunking' forum area?
 
PEAR is defunct, over, kaput. It was never taken seriously. The funding was mostly private, it was a bit of an embarrassment to Princeton.
 
Last edited:
Measurement in Quantum Theory
From the inception of Quantum Mechanics (QM) the concept of measurement has proved a source of difficulty. The Einstein-Bohr debates, out of which both the Einstein Podolski Rosen paradox and Schrödinger's cat paradox developed, centered upon this difficulty. The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics arises out of the fact that several principles of the theory appear to be in conflict. In particular, the dynamic principles of quantum mechanics seem to be in conflict with the postulate of collapse. David Albert puts the problem nicely when he says:

'The dynamics and the postulate of collapse are flatly in contradiction with one another ... the postulate of collapse seems to be right about what happens when we make measurements, and the dynamics seems to be bizarrely wrong about what happens when we make measurements, and yet the dynamics seems to be right about what happens whenever we aren't making measurements.' (Albert 1992, 79)

This has come to be known as "the measurement problem" and in what follows, we study the details and examine some of the implications of this problem. [continued]
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-measurement/

There is a view among some astophysicists [Quantum Cosmologists, I guess] that an observation of a QM system collapses the wavefunction of the observer, and not the function of that observed!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K