Constants in Second Order Differential Equation Solutions - A Simple Explanation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter luckis11
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the constants in the solutions of second-order differential equations, particularly focusing on their interpretation and the implications of initial conditions. Participants explore the relationship between initial conditions and the resulting solutions, questioning how these constants affect the behavior of the system described by the differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the constants c1 and c2 in the solutions of second-order differential equations could be related to the initial conditions f(0) and f'(0).
  • Another participant argues that the constants can take any values, leading to infinite solutions, and emphasizes the need for additional constraints to specify a unique solution.
  • A participant raises a concern regarding a specific case where setting initial conditions to zero results in the trivial solution f(t) = 0, questioning the validity of this outcome.
  • Responses clarify that the trivial solution is consistent with the initial conditions provided, explaining that if both position and velocity are zero at t=0, the object remains at rest.
  • One participant counters that the problem can be approached differently by changing the frame of reference, suggesting that initial conditions can be adjusted to yield non-zero solutions.
  • Another participant points out that changing the reference frame alters the nature of the differential equation, indicating that the original equation's properties may not hold under such transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of initial conditions and their implications for the solutions of the differential equations. There is no consensus on the best approach to resolve the apparent contradictions regarding the trivial solution and the effects of changing reference frames.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of solutions on the initial conditions and the potential for different interpretations based on the setup of the problem. The discussion reveals complexities in the relationship between the constants in the solutions and the physical interpretations of the equations.

luckis11
Messages
272
Reaction score
2
I use the calculator
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=f’’(t)=f(t)

What are the constants c1 and c2 appearing in the second order dif. eq. solutions?
A guess of mine is that c1=f(0) and c2=f ' (0), but I am not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The constants can be every number you like, and in any case you get a solution of the aquation. That is to say, the equation has infinite solutions. To specify one of them, you have to give additional constraints. These are usually the initial conditions, the values of the functions and its derivatives at a certain initial time t0. The number of initial conditions needed equals the order od the equation, that is, the higher derivative of the function that appears in the equations, and it's also the number of constants you get in the solution. In your case f(0) = c1 + c2 and f'(0) = c1 - c2.
 
But then e.g. for case that the acceleration is analogous to the distance travelled, e.g.
f’’(t)=5f(t), where f(t)=(distance travelled), f''(t)=(acceleration),
at the wolframalfa.com solution of this dif. eq.
when replacing c1=c2=0 (because f(0)=0 and f'(0)=0)
I get the nonsense that f(t)=0.
What’s going on?
 
Last edited:
luckis11 said:
But then e.g. for case that the acceleration is analogous to the distance travelled, e.g. f’’(t)=5f(t), where f(t)=(distance travelled), f''(t)=(acceleration),
at the wolframalfa.com solution of this dif. eq.
when replacing c1=c2=0 (because f(0)=0 and f'(0)=0)
I get the nonsense that f(t)=0.
What’s going on?

What's going on is that f(t) = 0 is the unique solution to any linear homogeneous differential equation will all initial conditions being zero. Your initial conditions do not describe what you think they describe. The acceleration depends on the displacement, so if at time t = 0 the object isn't displaced there's no acceleration. The only way the object could have a non-zero displacement and hence non-zero acceleration at a later time is if at t = 0 the object was moving, but it's not by your initial condition on the velocity. What you're describing is an object that's sitting still, and you got the correct solution for that initial condition.
 
Mute said:
The acceleration depends on the displacement, so if at time t = 0 the object isn't displaced there's no acceleration. The only way the object could have a non-zero displacement and hence non-zero acceleration at a later time is if at t = 0 the object was moving, but it's not by your initial condition on the velocity. What you're describing is an object that's sitting still, and you got the correct solution for that initial condition.

No. At the spring its motion dx is 0 at t=0, and the problem can be solved using dif.eq. just by setting that at t=0 its position is not zero, but A, i.e. just change the frame of reference. At t=0 its velocity x'(t=0) is 0.
 
Last edited:
luckis11 said:
No. At the spring its motion dx is 0 at t=0, and the problem can be solved using dif.eq. just by setting that at t=0 its position is not zero, but A, i.e. just change the frame of reference. At t=0 its velocity x'(t=0) is 0.

A differential equation + initial conditions is an initial value problem. For your differential equation, y'' - y = 0, the solution is y = c1et + c2e-2, just as given in WolframAlpha.

If the initial conditions are y(0) = 0 and y'(0) = 0, the unique solution to the DE is y \equiv 0. The initial conditions mean that at time t = 0, the object is at the origin and its velocity is 0. If the velocity is 0, the object isn't moving, so its acceleration is 0, so the object will remain at the origin. For these initial conditions, the solution y(t) = 0 is not nonsensical.
 
luckis11 said:
No. At the spring its motion dx is 0 at t=0, and the problem can be solved using dif.eq. just by setting that at t=0 its position is not zero, but A, i.e. just change the frame of reference. At t=0 its velocity x'(t=0) is 0.

No, the differential equation in question breaks translation invariance and so is not invariant under a change of reference frame. If you have

\ddot{x}(t) - x(t) = 0,
with initial conditions x(0) = x_0, \dot{x}(0) = \dot{x}_0, then changing reference frame amounts to setting x(t) = X(t) + x_0, so you get the initial conditions X(0) = 0 and dX/dt(0) = \dot{x}_0, but the differential equation is now

\ddot{X}(t) - X(t) = x_0.

This is equation is no longer homogeneous, so the unique solution is not zero unless the initial conditions are both zero.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K