Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Constants of nature in the early universe

  1. Aug 28, 2016 #1
    As I understand it, in string theory the constants of nature can taken on a huge different number of possible values and when the universe cools after the big bang these constants of nature get locked in as it were and become , well constants.

    My question is, what if we discard string theory - are there any non string theory reasons to think the constants of nature, like the cosmological constant or the masses of particles, could be different to what they are?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 29, 2016 #2

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Certain relationships appear to exist that suggest [at least to me] the values of natural constants are relational in some fundamental sense. Assuming the constants of nature are emergent properties of the universe, it seems reasonable to suspect the values assumed by the first constants to emerge affected the values available to constants that subsequently emerged. I personally prefer such an answer over anthropics to questions regarding the apparent fine tuning of natural constants.
     
  4. Aug 29, 2016 #3
    Any papers out there promoting this idea? i give you are thinking of CNS or is there some other framework that support this?
     
  5. Aug 29, 2016 #4
    I thought the constants were fixed by the initial conditions of the state of the universe prior to inflation?
     
  6. Aug 29, 2016 #5

    Chalnoth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes. Essentially any grand-unified theory has this property.

    One way of describing the broad features of the standard model of particle physics is by describing the symmetry groups it conforms to:
    SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1)

    These are, in order, the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force*, and the electromagnetic force. Physicists have been trying to come up with a single equation of motion following a single symmetry that explains the above. You can read a bit more details on some of the possibilities that have been examined here. But the fundamental point is that this higher-order symmetry had to be broken by some process, and usually that means that the symmetry could have been broken in other ways as well.

    * This isn't completely correct: the weak and electromagnetic forces are mixed in a sense, so this description is a bit oversimplified. But it's good enough for the point I'm trying to make.
     
  7. Aug 29, 2016 #6

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No mainstream theory expressing hierarchical dependencies between fundament natural constants has yet appeared in the literature, afaik, The Koide equation is a limited example of one such attempt, but, smacks more of numerology than any physical import. The widespread practice of substituting dimensionless constants as a mathematical convenience, however, also smacks of numerology without conceding an assumption of relational validity between dimensionless constants and their empirical constituents. The best justification we can offer is a proponderance of evidence case from the observed consistency of dimensionless constants across cosmic time scales.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Constants of nature in the early universe
  1. Early Universe (Replies: 3)

Loading...