Continuity of Multivariable Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of multivariable functions, specifically examining the function f(x) = 1 and its continuity in relation to definitions involving derivatives. Participants are exploring the implications of continuity and differentiability in the context of piecewise functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the continuity of the function f(x) = 1 and question its alignment with definitions of continuity involving derivatives. There is also exploration of a piecewise function and its discontinuity at a specific point, leading to questions about the implications for continuity and differentiability.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the continuity of f(x) = 1, while others raise questions about the continuity of a piecewise function and its derivatives. There is an ongoing examination of definitions and reasoning, with no explicit consensus reached on the implications of the definitions provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of continuity and differentiability as they relate to multivariable functions, particularly in the context of piecewise definitions and the continuity of derivatives.

Chewy0087
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
EDIT: just realized i might've been really stupid;

very simple question which will answer my stupidly long question;

is f(x) = 1 continuous?]

The reason I ask is that my book says;

[tex]f(x,y) \in C^{N}[/tex] in R [tex]\Leftrightarrow \frac{\partial ^{n} f}{\partial x^n} , \frac{\partial ^{n} f}{\partial x^{n-1}\partial y}, etc \in C[/tex] in R.

however you can imagine for f (x, y) = x which IS continuous,

f1(x, y) = 1 , would this be considered continuous, and if not, isn't that at ends with the definition above?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course it's continuous. lim (x1,y1)->(x,y) f(x1,y1)=1. f(x,y)=1. It's easy using any definition of continuity. Look one up!
 
Yes, I thought as much, but why then would;

f(x) = x (for x greater than/equal to 0) / 0 (for x less than 0)

Why then for this function would

[tex] f(x) \notin C^{1}[/tex]

?

Would it be because there is a jump, a "discontinuity" at 0, where f(x) goes from 1 to 0 instantly?
 
Chewy0087 said:
Yes, I thought as much, but why then would;

f(x) = x (for x greater than/equal to 0) / 0 (for x less than 0)

Why then for this function would

[tex] f(x) \notin C^{1}[/tex]

?

Would it be because there is a jump, a "discontinuity" at 0, where f(x) goes from 1 to 0 instantly?

Sure. f(x) is continuous. f'(x) is not continuous (I'm assuming you meant to say f'(x)). So it's not in C^1.
 
Hmmm so it's not continuous?

But then sureley it is at ends with the definition posted earlier; namingly

[tex] f(x,y) \in C^{N}[/tex] [tex] \Leftrightarrow \frac{\partial ^{n} f}{\partial x^n} , \frac{\partial ^{n} f}{\partial x^{n-1}\partial y}, etc \in C[/tex]

because df/dx is not continuous, so it is implied that f(x) is not continuous, or is there a flaw in my reasoning? :confused:

edit: and yeah sorry i meant f'(x)
 
sorry I just realized I'm being a major douche...i'm stupid, nevermind
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K