MHB Correcting a 2 x 3 Factorial ANOVA Chart

  • Thread starter Thread starter MWR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    anova Factorial
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying the accuracy of a 2 x 3 factorial ANOVA chart related to a study on speech errors involving distraction and speech difficulty. The researchers hypothesize that distracted participants with high difficulty speeches will make the most errors, and they present their data in a summary table. Participants in the forum emphasize the importance of ensuring that all components of the ANOVA table, particularly degrees of freedom, are correctly calculated and add up properly. There is a suggestion to format the data into a more readable table for clarity. Overall, the focus is on confirming the correctness of the ANOVA results and improving presentation for better understanding.
MWR
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Have I completed this 2 x 3 factorial ANOVA chart correctly?

A sample of ¬N = 36 is recruited to participate in a study about speech errors. The researchers believe that there is an interaction between whether the speaker is distracted (distracted or not distracted) and the difficulty of the speech they’re asked to present (low, medium, or high) on the number of speech errors. They hypothesize that the participants who are distracted who have a high difficulty speech will make the most errors. The data from this experiment were examined using a 2 x 3 factorial ANOVA. The results are presented in the following summary table.

Source SS df MS F

Between Treat. 39.2 5
Factor A 11.2 1 11.2 Fa = 4.00
Factor B 20 2 10 Fb = 5
AxB 8 2 4 Faxb = 2
Within Treat. 84 30 2.8
Total 123.2 35Thanks in advance for your help,

Ryan

- - - Updated - - -

I apologize for the format.
MWR said:
Have I completed this 2 x 3 factorial ANOVA chart correctly?

A sample of ¬N = 36 is recruited to participate in a study about speech errors. The researchers believe that there is an interaction between whether the speaker is distracted (distracted or not distracted) and the difficulty of the speech they’re asked to present (low, medium, or high) on the number of speech errors. They hypothesize that the participants who are distracted who have a high difficulty speech will make the most errors. The data from this experiment were examined using a 2 x 3 factorial ANOVA. The results are presented in the following summary table.

Source SS df MS F

Between Treat. 39.2 5
Factor A 11.2 1 11.2 Fa = 4.00
Factor B 20 2 10 Fb = 5
AxB 8 2 4 Faxb = 2
Within Treat. 84 30 2.8
Total 123.2 35Thanks in advance for your help,

Ryan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there. Can you try putting this info into a table? That will make it easier for us to read. Click on this button. View attachment 3576

With ANOVA tables it's all about making sure everything adds up, especially the degrees of freedom. I'll do my best to look it over when it's readable. :)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-11-19 at 8.26.03 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-11-19 at 8.26.03 PM.png
    661 bytes · Views: 105
Unfortunately, I am unable to view your picture. Also, I am not able to upload a .docx file either.

Jameson said:
Hi there. Can you try putting this info into a table? That will make it easier for us to read. Click on this button. View attachment 3576

With ANOVA tables it's all about making sure everything adds up, especially the degrees of freedom. I'll do my best to look it over when it's readable. :)
 
That's weird that you can't see my picture. Are you using a phone or tablet maybe?

Anyway, click the first button on the fourth row all the way to the left. It looks grid like.

Here is an example of a table.

[table="width: 500, class:grid"]
[tr]
[td]A[/td]
[td]B[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]C[/td]
[td]D[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
 
Jameson, perhaps the OP assumed there was an image to view by clicking the image you posted.

MWR, Jameson is referring to the following button on our toolbar:

View attachment 3578

Click that button and it will allow you to define a table for presenting your data. :D
 

Attachments

  • table-button.png
    table-button.png
    18.6 KB · Views: 107
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top