My question is about the interpretation of the large estimated value. In QM we are supposed to think in terms of measurement results and not of ontological properties. So, if QFT predicts a large vacuum energy what is the correct approach?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

1. The predicted value is the result you get if you measure the vacuum energy.

2. The predicted value is an intrinsic property of the vacuum and should therefore gravitate.

Thanks,

Andrei

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Cosmological constant estimation in QFT

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Cosmological constant estimation | Date |
---|---|

I Cosmological constant problem | Mar 10, 2018 |

I Are the energy fluctuations in space real or virtual? | Jan 18, 2018 |

How different can quantum vacuums be? | Jul 25, 2015 |

Not understanding cosmological constant in field theory | Nov 4, 2013 |

Cosmological constant in qft | Jun 21, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**