tmv3v
- 17
- 0
Is there a possibility that dark energy comes from mass that travels faster than the speed of light, making its mass imaginary?
The discussion centers around the possibility that dark energy could be linked to mass that travels faster than light, potentially resulting in imaginary mass. Participants explore the implications of this idea, including the relationship between mass, energy, and the nature of dark energy, as well as the constraints imposed by the speed of light.
Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between dark energy, imaginary mass, and the speed of light. There is no consensus on the validity of the proposed ideas or the implications of faster-than-light travel.
Participants reference various articles and FAQs for further information, indicating a reliance on existing literature to support their claims. The discussion includes unresolved assumptions about the nature of mass and energy in relation to dark energy.
tiny-tim said:hi tmv3v! welcome to pf!
e = mc² (and the c² is nothing more than a conversion factor),
so if the mass was imaginary, wouldn't the energy be imaginary also?![]()
Mordred said:couple of other points nothing moves faster than the speed of light and particles with mass cannot reach light speed. Dark energy is a mysterious energy that is attributed to causing expansion. No one knows where it comes from IE its source. However it is often attributed to being the energy driving expansion.
Dark matter has nothing to do with dark energy by the way, also its slower than relativistic speeds
there are numerous articles in the FAQ subforum that would be handy for you
Ned Wrights FAQ has some useful information you may want to check out
also http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
myself and other PF members wrote the article contained in this thread its lengthy as it covers expansion principles, redshift and cosmic distance ladder in one overall article. However you will find some info on dark energy in its contents as well.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=685265
the article is easily found here.
Welcome to the forum
tiny-tim said:hi tmv3v! welcome to pf!
e = mc² (and the c² is nothing more than a conversion factor),
so if the mass was imaginary, wouldn't the energy be imaginary also?![]()