Could gravitons be dimensionless?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jcap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton Gravitons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dimensionality of gravitons, specifically whether they are dimensionless due to their association with the dimensionless metric ##g_{\mu\nu}##. Participants explore the implications of gravitons being quantum excitations of the gravitational field and their relationship with the stress-energy tensor ##T_{\mu\nu}##. The conversation highlights the distinction between being dimensionless in terms of units and having zero size, ultimately concluding that if gravitons are excitations of the gravitational potential ##\Phi##, they must be dimensionless.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory and particle physics
  • Familiarity with general relativity and the concept of the metric tensor
  • Knowledge of the stress-energy tensor ##T_{\mu\nu}##
  • Basic grasp of natural units where ##\hbar=c=1##
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the stress-energy tensor ##T_{\mu\nu}## in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of dimensionless quantities in quantum mechanics
  • Study the relationship between gravitational waves and gravitons in quantum gravity theories
  • Investigate the concept of excitations in quantum fields, particularly in the context of gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and students of quantum gravity who are exploring the nature of gravitons and their dimensional properties.

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
If the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## is dimensionless and gravitons are quantum excitations of the metric does that mean that gravitons themselves are dimensionless?

I say this as locally the metric is just the flat metric ##\eta_{\mu\nu}=\hbox{diag}(-1,1,1,1)## with the dimensions in the co-ordinates ##x^\mu##.

To put it another way:

Is graviton energy included in the stress-energy tensor ##T_{\mu\nu}##?

Actually classical gravitational waves can be detected so does that imply that gravitons can't be dimensionless?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jcap said:
Actually classical gravitational waves can be detected so does that imply that gravitons can't be dimensionless?
Photons can be detected - so does that imply that they can't be dimensionless?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
jcap said:
If the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## is dimensionless and gravitons are quantum excitations of the metric does that mean that gravitons themselves are dimensionless?

Are you asking if they are point particles, or something deeper than that?
 
ohwilleke said:
Are you asking if they are point particles, or something deeper than that?
Ah, you beat me to it! :cool:

I was about to ask whether there might possibly be some confusion between two meanings of "dimensionless":

1. Not having associated dimensional units (e.g. in SI a.k.a. MKS units). The fine structure constant is dimensionless in this sense.

2. Having zero size, in some sense (e.g. an electron versus a proton)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
I mean (1) : not having dimensional units.

In terms of Newtonian gravitation we have the gravitational potential given by:

$$\Phi \sim -\frac{G M}{R}$$

In natural units, ##\hbar=c=1## (dimensionless), Newton's gravitational constant is ##G=1/M_{pl}^2## where ##M_{pl}## is the Planck mass. Therefore the dimensions of the gravitational field ##\Phi## is

$$[\Phi] = \frac{[M]^{-2}[M]}{[M]^{-1}}=1$$

If gravitons are excitations of ##\Phi## then they must themselves be dimensionless.

This is unlike other fields and their associated particles that have dimensions of mass/energy ##[M]##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
OK. It is now much more clear what you mean.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K