Could someone clear up the paper on casimir effect

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epislon58
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Casimir effect Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical transition between equations (3.6) and (3.7) in a paper regarding the Casimir effect. The substitution leading to the term l²/π² is clarified through the change of coordinates from Cartesian to polar, where x represents the radial variable. The term xdx arises from the Jacobian of the transformation, with the angular component integrated out, reflecting the integration over positive values of nx and ny in the first quadrant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Casimir effect and its mathematical formulations.
  • Familiarity with coordinate transformations, specifically from Cartesian to polar coordinates.
  • Knowledge of Jacobians in multivariable calculus.
  • Basic integration techniques in polar coordinates.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Casimir effect in quantum field theory.
  • Learn about coordinate transformations and their applications in physics.
  • Explore Jacobians and their role in changing variables in integrals.
  • Investigate integration techniques in polar coordinates for complex functions.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum mechanics or field theory, particularly those interested in the mathematical underpinnings of the Casimir effect.

epislon58
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hello,

could someone please explain to me what happens between (3.6) and (3.7). In specific, I don't understand how substitution results in l^2/pie^2 and also what do they mean integrating over radial angle. And the x next to the dx at (3.7), where did it come from.

http://aphyr.com/data/journals/113/comps.pdf

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
I didn't look that carefully but xdx is because x is a radial variable, so in the change of coordinates from Cartesian to polar, we usually get rdrdθ, where r is the Jacobian for the change of variables - they use x where I wrote r. The dθ doesn't appear because it has been integrated over already. Originally, they integrated over positive values of nx and ny, which are the original Cartesian coordinates. This is the first quadrant, ie. θ=0 to θ=∏/2.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
948
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
743
Replies
8
Views
5K