Count the F's in the Sentence: Uncover the Truth!

  • Thread starter Thread starter dontdisturbmycircles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Count
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around a brain teaser that challenges participants to count the letter "F" in the sentence: "FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF YEARS." The correct count is six, yet many users reported counting fewer, often due to overlooking the word "of." This phenomenon highlights how the human brain can misinterpret certain letters, leading to common mistakes in counting. The discussion also touches on informal English usage, particularly the incorrect phrases "should of" and "could of," which are prevalent among some English speakers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of English grammar and phonetics
  • Familiarity with cognitive psychology concepts related to perception
  • Knowledge of common English language mistakes
  • Awareness of informal versus formal English usage
NEXT STEPS
  • Research cognitive psychology related to visual perception and letter recognition
  • Explore the impact of phonetic spelling on language comprehension
  • Study common grammatical errors in English, focusing on informal usage
  • Learn about the psychology behind attention and focus in reading
USEFUL FOR

Language enthusiasts, educators, cognitive psychologists, and anyone interested in the nuances of English grammar and perception challenges.

dontdisturbmycircles
Messages
592
Reaction score
3
Don't cheat! Because if you did, the test would be no fun.I promise, there are no tricks to the test.
Read the sentence below and count the F's in that sentence.Count them ONLY ONCE. Do not go back and count them again.
See solutions for your score below (it's whited out).

FINISHED FILES ARE THE RE-
SULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIF-
IC STUDY COMBINED WITH
THE EXPERIENCE OF YEARS.

select to see:

There are six F's in the sentence.

There is no catch.
Many people forget the "OF"'s.
The human brain tends to see them as V's and not F's.
Pretty weird, huh?

I couldn't believe it, I concentrated very hard. Determined to count every single one, but still counted 3! :frown::smile:

I want to make sure I am not the only one
[/color]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Six, my friend :smile: But only because I'm encountered this specific one at least six times probably.
 
Thats another thing that pissed me off..

I remembered doing one, and missed F's on that one too... lol

Seeing as I have seen this before other people probably have too. Hopefully there are a few that will fall for it and feel as dumb as I did. :-P
 
Everytime I see the 'Finished Files...', 6 is the number that comes to mind. :D
 
I only counted three as well!
 
i counted 3 =O
 
I did cheat and read it over twice. Got 4 the first time and 5 the second. Missed that last damned 'of'. :redface:
 
Only because I remembered the "of" thing from previous scenarios I counted 6, "for" is another word people miss.
 
5 the first time n then 6(in the second hit ofcourse)
 
  • #10
In the answer 'circles provided, it is stated that "The human brain tends to see them as V's and not F's." I do not think that I "see them as V's." It may well have something to do with the way I pronounce words as opposed to, say, Americans or the British. But this brings up a question that has been nagging me for some time. I have noticed in quite a few internet forums that many people (USAmericans, as far I've seen) tend to write 'should of', 'could of' instead of the usual 'should have/should've' and 'could have/could've'. Is this form of writing restricted only to (informal?) US English?
 
  • #11
neutrino said:
In the answer 'circles provided, it is stated that "The human brain tends to see them as V's and not F's." I do not think that I "see them as V's."
Your brain doesn't see them as v's, it's that we tend to overlook words like "of" because we're focussing on the key words.

I have noticed in quite a few internet forums that many people (USAmericans, as far I've seen) tend to write 'should of', 'could of' instead of the usual 'should have/should've' and 'could have/could've'. Is this form of writing restricted only to (informal?) US English?
It's not correct English, even informal, it's a mistake where people are typing phonectically, and a very widespread mistake at that.
 
  • #12
Thanks for clearing that up, Evo. :)
 
  • #13
Since I'm not a native speaker I counted 6[/color] at the very 1st try!
 
  • #14
3 for me! Those pesky f's are hard to keep track of!
 
  • #15
Lisa! said:
Since I'm not a native speaker I counted 6[/color] at the very 1st try!
Also you're smarter than the average bear. And you probably don't know what that means. It's a compliment.
 
  • #16
3 F's. Probably because of the typical focusing on the key words. But then again, one needed to look for the F's ! This is interesting.
 
  • #17
Evo said:
Also you're smarter than the average bear. And you probably don't know what that means. It's a compliment.

Thanks! Yea, I had to google to see what that means!:-p
 
  • #18
Holy crap! I put in a concerted effort when I counted the Fs, and even cheated and counted again, but only found 3! Wow. :bugeye:
 
  • #19
Yea, with the 'seeing them as v's' thing, I just copied and pasted from the email I got.:smile:

morphism said:
Holy crap! I put in a concerted effort when I counted the Fs, and even cheated and counted again, but only found 3! Wow. :bugeye:

Thats the exact same feeling I had! :-p (although I didn't count again)
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Lol, this is "effing" great.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
18K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
26K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K