Curvature & Connection Without Metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between Christoffel symbols of the first and second kinds in the context of differential geometry without a metric. It clarifies that Christoffel symbols are typically associated with the Levi-Civita connection and emphasizes the broader concept of connection coefficients in vector bundles. The curvature tensor is defined using the formula involving the covariant derivative, highlighting its significance in understanding geometric properties. The conversation underscores the challenges of conceptualizing these ideas without a metric framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Christoffel symbols (first and second kinds)
  • Familiarity with differential geometry concepts
  • Knowledge of vector bundles and connection coefficients
  • Basic grasp of curvature tensors and covariant derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita connection in Riemannian geometry
  • Explore the role of connection coefficients in vector bundles
  • Learn about the implications of curvature tensors in differential geometry
  • Investigate the relationship between Christoffel symbols and curvature in non-metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry seeking to deepen their understanding of connections and curvature in geometric contexts without relying on a metric framework.

pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,443
Reaction score
1,606
In the absence of a metric, we can not raise and lower indices at will.

There are two sorts of Christoffel symbols, Christoffels of the first kind, ##\Gamma^a{}_{bc}## in component notation, and Christoffel symbols of the second kind, ##\Gamma_{abc}##. What's the relationship between the two kinds of Christoffel symbols? Is perhaps one of them a connection between vectors, and the other a connection between covectors?

Similarly, is ##R^a{}_{bcd}## "the" curvature tensor?

I suppose it'd be better to express this in terms of geometry rather than components, but I'm struggling a bit to do that.

This is all very basic, but I'm just not used to thinking about differential geometry without a metric :(.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Typically the nomenclature ”Christoffel symbols” is generally reserved for the connection coefficients of the Levi-Civita connection. As such, they don't really hold meaning outside of a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold.

The more general concept of connection coefficients ##\Gamma_{\mu i}^j## relate to the connection on a vector bundle where I have written the fiber indices with Latin letters. Choosing a basis ##E_i## for the fiber, the connection coefficients are defined by
$$
\nabla_\mu E_i = \Gamma_{\mu i}^j E_j.
$$
For a the tangent bundle, the indices are the same as the indices of the base manifold itself and you would write ##\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^\lambda## etc. (So if you don't want to think about general vector bundle, just replace ##i## and ##j## by Greek letters.)

The corresponding connection on the dual bundle is found by using a basis ##E^i## with the property ##E^i\cdot E_j = \delta^i_j##. From this follows that
$$
0 = \nabla_\mu (E^i \cdot E_j) = E^i \cdot \Gamma_{\mu j}^k E_k + (\nabla_\mu E^i)\cdot E_j = \Gamma_{\mu j}^i + (\nabla_\mu E^i)\cdot E_j
$$
leading to
$$
(\nabla_\mu E^i)\cdot E_j = -\Gamma_{\mu j}^i.
$$
In other words, the connection coefficients on the dual bundle is the same as those on the vector bundle with opposite sign.

As for the curvature tensor, it is uniquely defined by
$$
R(X,Y) A = \nabla_X \nabla_Y A - \nabla_Y \nabla_X A - \nabla_{[X,Y]} A,
$$
where ##X## and ##Y## are in the tangent space and ##A## in the fiber.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, pervect and dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K