Curved space-time observed and confirmed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter uiulic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observed Space-time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the observation of curved space-time, particularly in relation to neutron stars and the implications for fundamental physics. Participants share links to articles and images, while clarifying the nature of the observations and representations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a picture related to neutron stars, suggesting it may not be new information.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the specific paper or reference related to the picture.
  • A participant emphasizes that their contribution is based on observations rather than a deep understanding of physics.
  • Links to articles in English are provided to support the discussion, highlighting the significance of the observations for fundamental physics problems.
  • There is a clarification that the image shared is a graphical representation rather than an actual photograph of the celestial body in question.
  • Participants discuss the interpretation of observations made by astronomers using specific instruments, noting that the term "seen" does not imply direct visual evidence but rather observational support for general relativity's predictions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation regarding the nature of the observations and representations. There is no consensus on the implications of the findings or the specifics of the observations.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the potential misunderstanding of graphical representations versus actual observations, as well as the reliance on external links for information that may not be universally accessible.

uiulic
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Neutron Stars (black hole?) picture. maybe this not news.

Published in something like "physics review of celestial body".

I attached a pic, but it does not manage to show.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Huh? Are you proposing a specific paper which has interested you for discussion here? If so, could you please provide an exact reference?
 
No, OBSERVATIONS only. I know nothing about physics. Just want to share the pic.
 
Oh right ok. Well perhaps you could link to the page you found this picture, or attach it here?
 
The Chinsese one (hehe, I know you guys cannot understand, and maybe your computer will say there is undefined character in the link so that the link will be blocked).

http://www.6park.com/news/messages/64489.html


The link says the importance of the observation to some fundmental physics problems is very great, although it is not a surprising discovery.You can find the corresponding English news of course somewhere else, which I can't help.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the English links, which are just what I had intended to show.
 
Einstein’s predicted distortion of space-time

neutrino said:
uiulic, you do realize that it's a drawing/graphical representation, right? It's not an actual photo of Serpens-1. (Just making sure.)

Here's the PR from ESA: http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMPJXE1P5F_index_0.html

But it did say the following in the above link:
>> Astronomers using XMM-Newton and Suzaku have seen Einstein’s predicted distortion of space-time
 
  • #10
mendocino said:
But it did say the following in the above link:
>> Astronomers using XMM-Newton and Suzaku have seen Einstein’s predicted distortion of space-time
But they don't mean "seen" in the literal sense of being able to see it with your eyes in a photograph, they just mean they found a new form of observational evidence to support GR's predictions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K