Are Our Understandings of Cyclone Separators Misguided?

  • Thread starter Thread starter styart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
The discussion critiques the common understanding of cyclone separators, particularly those using water, arguing that the traditional explanation of particles being thrown outward and slowed by friction is inaccurate. Observations from homemade transparent separators reveal that particles actually move into a central column and fall gradually. An experiment with stirring water and adding particles like sugar illustrates this behavior. Additionally, the conversation touches on the application of cyclone principles in bagless vacuum cleaners and various types of separators used in ships. The insights challenge established notions and encourage further exploration of cyclone separator functionality.
styart
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is science explaining how cyclone separators work, is so wrong, at least those that work with water, the notion that particles are thrown to the outside and slow by friction until they fall is just wrong.
I have built several homemade separators from transparent plastic and have observed them in action, the particles go into a narrow column in the center of the separator and gradually fall.
If you don't believe me try this experiment, fill a tall glass with water, stir vigorously and drop in particles like sugar or similar, and watch what happens.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums. :)

I believe some bagless vacuum cleaners use a cyclone principle. Do they fit the description you decry?
 
Water/oil separators are common appliances, look for their principles of operation, usually the first section of the operators manual. My ships had two centrifugal and one gravity separator.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K