Does Dark Matter's Interaction with Gravity Prevent it from Forming Black Holes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of dark matter and its interaction with gravity, specifically questioning why dark matter does not form black holes despite having mass and being pervasive. Participants explore the differences between dark matter and normal matter, the implications of dark matter's weak interactions, and its role in cosmic structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why dark matter, if it has mass and interacts with gravity, does not accumulate at points of mass to form black holes.
  • Others note that dark matter appears to behave differently from normal matter, with one participant mentioning a higher density of dark matter in globular clusters compared to spiral galaxies.
  • It is proposed that dark matter is weakly interacting, leading to a lack of clumping, as it can pass through itself without significant interaction.
  • Some argue that dark matter's role in cosmology is to provide gravitational seeds for galaxy formation, suggesting it may have influenced the timing and quantity of galaxy formation.
  • Questions arise about whether dark matter could fall into stable orbits around massive objects and if it experiences a "sieving" process similar to visible matter during solar system formation.
  • Participants discuss the inability of dark matter to cool through radiative processes, which may prevent it from collapsing under gravity as normal matter does.
  • There is a debate about whether dense collections of dark matter could increase temperature and whether multiple dark matter particles can occupy the same space simultaneously, depending on their nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the behavior of dark matter, its interactions, and its implications for cosmic structures. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the mechanisms at play.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of dark matter, its interactions, and the definitions of temperature and kinetic energy in the context of dark matter dynamics. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of dark matter's properties or its effects on gravitational collapse.

MisterBig
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
If dark matter has mass, interacts with gravity, and is pervasive then why isn’t it gathering at points of mass and turning all the suns into black holes?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I have also wondered this too. In most descriptons I read, it seems to act totally different from normal matter, why? In a recent programme I watched, a scientist made an announcement that DM in globular clusters was at a much higher density that spiral galaxies, why aren't we seeing DM black holes and other measuable effects? It only seems to add to the 'average' mass of galaxies without even producing localised anomalies.
 
Because dark matter is weakly interacting with other dark matter. It doesn't act like normal matter.

Take two large masses of normal matter, separate them, and let them go. They will gravitate towards one another and hit, eventually forming a large single mass.

Take two large masses of dark matter, separate them, and let them go. They will gravitate towards one another and pass through each other, slow down, stop, and repeat. At least this is what it looks like it does.

Dark matter doesn't really clump. If you look at the dark matter distribution for galaxies you see a smooth increase in density radially with no clumping up anywhere. It basically forms the same system you would get with regular gas if the atoms passed right through each other.
 
You pretty much summed it up silverpig. DM is both dark and mysterious. It is so anti-social it does not even interact with it's own kind. The major role of DM in modern cosmology was to provide the gravitational seeds needed to initiate stellar and galactic formation in the early universe. Without DM, it is thought galaxy formation would have taken longer and fewer would have formed, perhaps much fewer.
 
silverpig said:
Take two large masses of dark matter, separate them, and let them go. They will gravitate towards one another and pass through each other, slow down, stop, and repeat. At least this is what it looks like it does.
Ah. OK. Could it fall into stable orbits around massive objects or is the reason we do not observe the effect of dark matter’s gravity locally because it has a uniform density throughout the galaxy?

As the solar system was forming would you expect dark matter to go through the same "sieving" process as the visible matter, heavier elements ending up close to the sun? Is there a ring of dark matter orbiting the sun?
 
MisterBig said:
If dark matter has mass, interacts with gravity, and is pervasive then why isn’t it gathering at points of mass and turning all the suns into black holes?

When a cloud of normal matter collapse by its own gravity then its temperature increased by a large amount. Since normal matter can interact with radiation so it is easy for it to cool by radiative colling. This cooling enhance further gravitational collapse. Since dark matter does not interact with rdaition so it can not cool and this heat prevents it from further collapsing. Conclusion is that dark matter clusters less stronger than normal matter.
 
Last edited:
cosmoboy said:
When a cloud of normal matter collapse by its own gravity its temperature
increased by a large amount. Since normal matter can interact with radiation so it it easy for it to cool by radiative colling. This cooling enhance further gravitational collapse. Since dark matter does not interact with rdaition so it can not cool further and this heat prevents it from further collapse. Conclusion is that dark matter clusters less stronger than normal matter.
Interesting, and I find the concept of some sort of “super insulated sun” amusing but…
If dark matter cannot interact with itself, why would a dense collection of it cause an increase in temperature? In fact, if dark matter is so weekly interacting, could several particles exist at the same point in space simultaneously?
 
MisterBig said:
Interesting, and I find the concept of some sort of “super insulated sun” amusing but…
If dark matter cannot interact with itself, why would a dense collection of it cause an increase in temperature? In fact, if dark matter is so weekly interacting, could several particles exist at the same point in space simultaneously?

In genearl when we talk about temperature then we mean kinetic energy. When a dark matter cloud collapse then its potential energy increases
(in magnitude, it becomes more negative). Since the total energy must remain same so the kinetic energy also increases. As long as dark matter particles are moving fast they can not cluster much. Radiative cooling is the only way by which they can slow down their motion, which is not possible for dark matter.

Dark matter is considered to be collisionless, means in dark matter binary collisions are rare. Either more than one dark matter particles can exist at the same place depends on their nature. For example if you take neutrino as dark matter particle, then they can not exist at same place because they are fermi particles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K