Deep thoughts from a squirrel monkey

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a humorous New York Times article about animal consciousness, particularly focusing on a joke involving lab rats and their understanding of experimental conditions. The article uses a playful analogy about a rat's awareness of temporal awareness through food consumption, highlighting the absurdity of the situation where the rat seems to outsmart the experimenters. The conversation draws parallels to a joke from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," where lab mice are depicted as the true rulers of Earth, viewing humans as mere subjects in their experiments. The humor emphasizes the idea that life in a lab, with its simplicity and lack of mundane office tasks, might be preferable to a typical cubicle job. The overall tone is lighthearted, exploring themes of intelligence and the nature of experimental life for animals.
jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
16,023
Reaction score
7,623
I was updating one of our bulletin boards (the kind that you attach paper things to with thumbtacks, not the online kind) and found a New York Times article that I stuck up there a year and a half ago. It had to do with studies of consciousness in animals, and was illustrated with some pictures of experimental animals with humorous cartoon-style "thought balloons." Here's my favorite:

Squirrel Monkey said:
When is one nice, chewy date better than four nice, chewy dates? When you're an experimental subject being tested for temporal awareness. You see, I HAVE LEARNED, FROM PAST EXPERIENCE, that the more dates I eat now, the less water will be available later, in the future. It makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE, but when you live in a lab, you get used to that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't get it. Can someone explain to in a "I have very little biology/psychology knowledge" kind of way?
 
That the lab rat fully understands the psychology experiements that it is in and just regards them as part of the price to pay for living in a lab. ie The test subject is smarter than the person doing the experiment.

There's a similair joke in HitchHikers when it's explained to the human that lab mice were running the Earth and people were just part of their experiment.
 
The part that resonated with me was the last sentence. :biggrin:
 
the lab can't be any worse than a cubicle
 
Proton Soup said:
the lab can't be any worse than a cubicle
It's better - I just have to press this little button with my nose and food comes out.
And there are no TPS reports, email or PowerPoint!
 
mgb_phys said:
TPS reports
We need to talk. I heard you were having problems with your TPS reports.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
78
Views
12K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top