Definition of the dressed propagator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hellfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Propagator
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 7K views
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
1
In section 7.3 of Ryder's "Quantum Field Theory", the "complete" or "dressed" propagator is defined to be the two-point function to all orders of the perturbation expansion. It is denoted in (7.71) as [tex]G_c^{(2)}(x, y)[/tex]. It changes the bare mass to the physical mass. My question is, why aren't contributions from other n-point functions considered for this definition? For example, the 4-point function contains also disconnected graphs that modify the propagator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should they be? Both for a free and an interacting theory the propagator is the 2 point function by definition (connected or disconnected it doesn't matter, since there are only 2 spacetime points).

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
connected or disconnected it doesn't matter, since there are only 2 spacetime points.
Thanks, this makes sense. I was somehow confused, but your comment answers exactly my question.