Definition of the potential energy operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The potential energy operator in quantum mechanics is defined as ##\hat{V} = V(\hat{x})##, where ##V## is a function of position. This formulation is valid for all potential energy functions, regardless of whether they can be expanded in a power series. The relationship ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle## holds true by the definition of the position representation. For further reading, J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" (Revised Edition, Addison-Wesley, 1994) is recommended as a foundational text.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian operators
  • Knowledge of position representation in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Hamiltonian operator in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the position representation in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about potential energy functions and their properties
  • Read J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists exploring potential energy concepts, and anyone seeking to understand the mathematical formulation of quantum operators.

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
In quantum mechanics, I can write the hamiltonian as ##\hat{H} = \hat{p}^{2}/2m + \hat{V}##. I am confusing with the definition of the operator ##\hat{V}##, who represents the potential energy. If the potential energy depend only on the position, is it correct write ##\hat{V} = V(\hat{x})##? And, assuming that ##V## can be expanded in a power series of ##\hat{x}##, and using ##\hat{x} | x \rangle = x | x \rangle##, can I write ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle##? I would like know if this things I wrote are correct. Does anyone know a book or article that talk about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are right. A good introductory QT textbook is

J.J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics, Revised Edition, Addison-Wesley 1994
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lebnm
Lebnm said:
assuming that ##V## can be expanded in a power series of ##\hat{x}##, and using ##\hat{x} | x \rangle = x | x \rangle##, can I write ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle##?
By definition of the position representation, this is correct for all ##V##, even if no series expansion exists.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Lebnm
A. Neumaier said:
By definition of the position representation, this is correct for all ##V##, even if no series expansion exists.

Why? Would not this imply that all potentials are local?

Do you have references about this? it has been difficult find books that talk about this.
 
Lebnm said:
Why? Would not this imply that all potentials are local?

Do you have references about this? it has been difficult find books that talk about this.
For all ##V(x) ##, as in your formula. Usually only such interactions get the name potential energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K