Definition of the potential energy operator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and properties of the potential energy operator in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the representation of the potential energy in terms of position and its implications. Participants explore theoretical aspects and seek clarification on the operator's formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if potential energy depends only on position, it is correct to write the potential energy operator as ##\hat{V} = V(\hat{x})##.
  • Another participant agrees and states that using the position representation, it follows that ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle## is correct for all potential functions ##V##, regardless of whether a power series expansion exists.
  • Some participants question whether this implies that all potentials are local, indicating a potential misunderstanding or broader implications of the definitions involved.
  • There is a request for references or literature that discusses these concepts, highlighting the difficulty in finding relevant resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the formulation of the potential energy operator, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of this formulation, particularly concerning the locality of potentials.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on definitions and the implications of the position representation, but do not resolve the questions about locality or the existence of power series expansions for all potential functions.

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
In quantum mechanics, I can write the hamiltonian as ##\hat{H} = \hat{p}^{2}/2m + \hat{V}##. I am confusing with the definition of the operator ##\hat{V}##, who represents the potential energy. If the potential energy depend only on the position, is it correct write ##\hat{V} = V(\hat{x})##? And, assuming that ##V## can be expanded in a power series of ##\hat{x}##, and using ##\hat{x} | x \rangle = x | x \rangle##, can I write ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle##? I would like know if this things I wrote are correct. Does anyone know a book or article that talk about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are right. A good introductory QT textbook is

J.J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics, Revised Edition, Addison-Wesley 1994
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lebnm
Lebnm said:
assuming that ##V## can be expanded in a power series of ##\hat{x}##, and using ##\hat{x} | x \rangle = x | x \rangle##, can I write ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle##?
By definition of the position representation, this is correct for all ##V##, even if no series expansion exists.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Lebnm
A. Neumaier said:
By definition of the position representation, this is correct for all ##V##, even if no series expansion exists.

Why? Would not this imply that all potentials are local?

Do you have references about this? it has been difficult find books that talk about this.
 
Lebnm said:
Why? Would not this imply that all potentials are local?

Do you have references about this? it has been difficult find books that talk about this.
For all ##V(x) ##, as in your formula. Usually only such interactions get the name potential energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K