Degenerate time indep. perturbation theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the principles of time-independent degenerate perturbation theory, specifically addressing why the perturbation part of the Hamiltonian is diagonalized instead of the original Hamiltonian. Participants explore the implications of degeneracy and the representation of the Hamiltonian in different bases.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the perturbation part of the Hamiltonian is diagonalized rather than the original Hamiltonian.
  • Another participant asserts that the unperturbed part is proportional to the unit matrix due to all states in the degenerate subspace having the same energy.
  • A subsequent reply challenges the assertion about the unperturbed Hamiltonian being proportional to the identity, citing a specific problem where the matrix representation had off-diagonal elements.
  • This participant suggests that the operator or matrix that diagonalizes the perturbed part may also diagonalize the unperturbed part, though they express uncertainty about this idea.
  • Another participant clarifies that the matrix representation of the unperturbed Hamiltonian is diagonal in the eigen-basis, and emphasizes that within the degenerate subspace, the Hamiltonian is effectively represented by a matrix proportional to the unit matrix.
  • This participant also notes that any linear combination of states within the degenerate subspace remains an eigenstate of the unperturbed Hamiltonian with the same degenerate energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the representation of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, with some agreeing on its proportionality to the unit matrix while others contest this point. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these representations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the basis used for the Hamiltonian representations, and the discussion highlights the dependence on the choice of basis for diagonalization.

ice109
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
6
why in time independent degenerate perturbation we diagonalize the matrix of the perturbation part of the hamilitonian and not the original hamiltonian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the unperturbed part is just proportional to the unit matrix since all states in the degenerate subspace have the same energy.
 
jensa said:
Because the unperturbed part is just proportional to the unit matrix since all states in the degenerate subspace have the same energy.
what? the bold part is true and i agree with.

the italicized part isn't true, firstly since i just did a problem where the matrix representation of the unperturbed part had off diagonals, secondly because an unperturbed part which was proportional to the identity would imply that it's already diagonalized and hence no degeneracy and hence no need for degenerate theory.

i'm thinking it's because the the operator/matrix that diagonalizes the perturbed part also diagonalizes the unperturbed part. but I'm probably wrong.
 
Of course it depends on what basis you are using if the matrix representation is diagonal or not. I assumed that you are working in an eigen-basis of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. In this basis the matrix representation of the unperturbed Hamiltonian is diagonal with entries corresponding to the eigen-energies, right? As far as the degenerate subspace is concerned the hamiltonian is diagonal with the same eigen-energies, hence it is proportional to the unit matrix.

The point of degenerate perturbation theory is that can choose a basis of the degenerate subspace arbitrarily and obviously it is most convenient to choose this basis such that it diagonalizes the perturbation. Then once we have made this choice of basis we can perform regular (non-degenerate) perturbation.

The reason why we do not care about diagonalizing the unperturbed part is because any linear combination of states within the degenerate subspace will also be an eigenstate of the unperturbed part with the degenerate energy. This is just another way of saying that the unperturbed Hamiltonian in this subspace is represented by a matrix proportional to the unit matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K