Describing Force using potentials

  • Thread starter randybryan
  • Start date
  • #1
52
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Just started revision for Quantum Mechanics after a very long break so everything is a bit rusty. Don't have anyone nearby at hand to ask, so hoping someone here will help.

Been given Newton's second law of motion as

F= m d^2 x/ dt^2

which is a second order equation hence requiring two initial conditions, often given as x(t=0) and dx/dt (t=0). Then, to quote from my lecture notes, ''In quatum mechanics, we will work with potentials, rather than forces, so we will be restricted to conservative systems where energy is constant. The aboe Newton's law equation can be written as

AND THIS IS WHERE I CAN'T DEDUCE WHAT'S GOING ON

F= md^2x/dt^2 = -dV/dx

Where does the -dV/dx come from? I know this is a potential, but I don't know how it was derived
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,832
251
hi randybryan! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
''In quatum mechanics, we will work with potentials, rather than forces, so we will be restricted to conservative systems where energy is constant. The aboe Newton's law equation can be written as

AND THIS IS WHERE I CAN'T DEDUCE WHAT'S GOING ON

F= md^2x/dt^2 = -dV/dx

Where does the -dV/dx come from? I know this is a potential, but I don't know how it was derived
"conservative system" means that the force F is conservative, ie that it is the gradient of a potential, V

in other words: by definition F.i = dV/dx (i'm not sure about the "minus" :confused:)
 
  • #3
194
0
hi randybryan! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


"conservative system" means that the force F is conservative, ie that it is the gradient of a potential, V

in other words: by definition F.i = dV/dx (i'm not sure about the "minus" :confused:)
Force is the minus gradient of potential. And this is a classical physics question, not quantum.
 
  • #4
52
0
Thanks guys, it all makes sense now!

The reason it is negative is because it tends to zero at infinity as it moves away from potential well.

The only reason I put it in Quantum physics section is because it is used to rationalise Schrodingers equation
 

Related Threads on Describing Force using potentials

Replies
6
Views
474
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
919
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
505
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Top