Designing a Car Engine Piston: Thermodynamics Question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 3K views
gezibash
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Recently I have been studying thermodynamics and I wanted to analyze a fictitious car piston of my own design. Indeed I have quite some questions, but the most important is this one, and maybe someone could give me an opinion on my progress.

I started off by selecting the fuel, which according to some internet source (I forgot, can't cite) suggested that I should use Octane, so I wrote the chemical equation,

[tex]C_8H_{18} + 12.5(O_2+3.76N_2) \rightarrow 8CO_2 + 9H_2O + 23.5N_2[/tex]
and I used the AFR ultimately computing the ratio to be,

[tex]i = \frac{m_o}{m_f} = 15.0279[/tex]
After this, I computed the densities of air and octane,

[tex]\rho_A = 1.2754 \frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}[/tex]
and

[tex]\rho_F = 703 \frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}[/tex]
I randomly selected a Vp = 1.8L volume, so I went ahead and wrote these two equations,

[tex] m_A = i \cdot m_F \\<br /> \frac{1}{\rho_A}m_A + \frac{1}{\rho_F}m_F = V_p[/tex]
From which, when you solve it, you get a total mass of

[tex] m_T = m_A + m_F = 2.448 \; \text{grams}[/tex]
My question is, is this feasible? Does the entire mass of the fuel and air mixture amount to about 2.448 grams in a single cylinder? If not, where did I go wrong?

Also, I would be most grateful if someone could point to a book or anything of the educational nature on this subject?

My next steps from here would be to try and figure the heat of combustion and then I will start to compute an Otto Cycle, perhaps later even use a more realistic intake/exhaust cycle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks a lot. Yeah, I suppose I should fix that.
 
Hi Chet, thanks for the reply. Sadly I did not manually calculate the densities, I used Tables from the internet to get them at 20°C, 1 bar - since I figured those would be intake conditions.
 
gezibash said:
Hi Chet, thanks for the reply. Sadly I did not manually calculate the densities, I used Tables from the internet to get them at 20°C, 1 bar - since I figured those would be intake conditions.
For those conditions, I got 2.28 gm for an afr of 15.

I got mole fraction of air = partial pressure of air (atm) = 0.9833
mole fraction of fuel = partial pressure of fuel (atm) = 0.01667
mass of air = 2.136 gm
mass of fuel = 0.1424 gm

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
For those conditions, I got 2.28 gm for an afr of 15.

Yes, that seems pretty good. I was just making sure that the answer itself is logical, so anything around 2-3 grams would be on the right track here.
 
Yeah, but I would have to time the cylinder stroke. Check my train of thought here,

[tex]n_1\;m_1\;N_c = \dot{m}[/tex]
Where [itex]n_1 = 1500\;\text{rpm}[/itex], [itex]m_1 = 2.448\;\text{gm}[/itex] and [itex]N_c = 8[/itex] (number of cylinders).
 
Lol I could not have been wronger than my previous post. I used the combined mass of both the fuel and air. Clearly that is not a fuel consumption rate. I need to use [itex]m_1\approx 0.15 \text{gm}[/itex]
 
You also need to account for how often intakes occur. Presumably it's a four stroke engine...Not a mythical half stroke engine as your equation implies..The average V8 will cruise close to 1500rpm at highway speed (100km/hr)
With that information you can go ahead and convert your fuel mass flow rate to litres/100km (or mpg if you're that way inclined) so you can see how your values compare with real world fuel consumption data.