When Did the First Stars in the Universe Form?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the formation of the first stars in the Universe, particularly in relation to findings from the ESA's Planck satellite and their implications for the timeline of cosmic events, including reionization. The scope includes theoretical implications and observational evidence from astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a study from ESA's Planck satellite indicating that the first stars formed later than previously thought, suggesting they completed half of the reionization process when the Universe was 700 million years old.
  • Others point out a conflict with earlier findings regarding the distance of the galaxy GN-z11, which was observed at a redshift of 11.1, suggesting that stars must have formed earlier than 400 million years after the Big Bang to account for the reionization era.
  • A participant highlights the significance of the transition period known as the reionization era, which is characterized by the heating and clearing of hydrogen gas due to starlight from primordial galaxies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the timeline of star formation and reionization, indicating that multiple competing models and interpretations exist without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in the assumptions made regarding the timing of star formation and the definitions of the reionization era, as well as unresolved mathematical implications related to the observations of distant galaxies.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.00716.pdf

Date:
September 2, 2016
Source:
European Space Agency (ESA)
Summary:
ESA's Planck satellite has revealed that the first stars in the Universe started forming later than previous observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background indicated. This new analysis also shows that these stars were the only sources needed to account for reionising atoms in the cosmos, having completed half of this process when the Universe had reached an age of 700 million years.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The link you provide is a lecture on inflation
 
wolram said:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.00716.pdf

Date:
September 2, 2016
Source:
European Space Agency (ESA)
Summary:
ESA's Planck satellite has revealed that the first stars in the Universe started forming later than previous observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background indicated. This new analysis also shows that these stars were the only sources needed to account for reionising atoms in the cosmos, having completed half of this process when the Universe had reached an age of 700 million years.
That conflicts with their earlier finding:
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record

...

Before astronomers determined the distance to GN-z11, the most distant measured galaxy, EGSY8p7, had a redshift of 8.68. Now, the team has confirmed GN-z11’s distance to be at a redshift of 11.1, which corresponds to 400 million years after the Big Bang.

The previous record-holder was seen in the middle of the epoch when starlight from primordial galaxies was beginning to heat and lift a fog of cold, hydrogen gas,” explains co-author Rychard Bouwens from the University of Leiden, the Netherlands. “This transitional period is known as the reionisation era. GN-z11 is observed 150 million years earlier, near the very beginning of this transition in the evolution of the Universe.

Source:
NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope News

Since stars are a fundamental component of galaxies, that would mean stars would have had to form earlier than 400 million years after the Big Bang. It would also mean that the reionization era ended approximately 550 million years after the Big Bang.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
997
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
952
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
905
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K