Suppose I have a really simple first order linear ODE like:$$\dot{\omega} = -k\omega$$ where k is some constant, ω(t) is a function of time that I want to solve for, and the overdot denotes the derivative w.r.t. time. This is really easy to solve, and we all know that with the initial condition ω(0) = ω(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); _{0}, the solution is given by ω(t) = ω_{0}exp(-kt). Now, I was thinking. You can find a solution that makes this equation true. If this equation is true, then if I differentiate both sides, then the result should also be true right :uhh: (realizes there may be some sketchy reasoning here). So if I differentiate both sides, I get$$\ddot{\omega} = -k\dot{\omega}$$If the first ODE was true given the solution above, this ODE should also be true given that solution. And that is the case, because for that solution, ##\ddot{\omega} = k^2\omega = -k\dot{\omega}##. Now, if I use the symbol ##\alpha## to denote ##\dot{\omega}## then the equation is $$\dot{\alpha} = -k\alpha$$The solution to *this* equation, assuming an initial condition of α(0) = α_{0}, is, of course, α(t) = α_{0}exp(-kt). Now, if I solve for ω(t) by integrating α(t), still assuming that ω(0) = ω_{0}, then I get:$$\omega(t) - \omega_0 = \int_0^t \alpha_0\exp(-kt^\prime)\,dt^\prime$$ $$\omega(t) = \omega_0 + \frac{\alpha_0}{k}[1 - \exp(-kt)] $$So, this solution doesn't have the same form as the original ω(t). What stupid thing have I overlooked here?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Differentiating a 1st order ODE: really dumb question

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**