Discover the Versatile SkyCat Blimps with Unmatched Payload Capacity

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential of SkyCat blimps, particularly their payload capacity and feasibility for various applications, including cargo transport in challenging environments. Participants explore the historical context of airships, their advantages and disadvantages, and the economic viability of such technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight the large payload capacity of the SkyCat-20 and SkyCat-220, suggesting they could outperform existing air freight alternatives.
  • Others express skepticism about the common use of blimps, citing concerns over their appearance, expense, and historical safety issues.
  • One participant recalls the poor track record of dirigibles, particularly in relation to weather susceptibility, suggesting limited operational areas.
  • A participant shares insights from a previous venture involving a similar airship, discussing challenges related to helium management and economic feasibility.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the future availability of helium, questioning the sustainability of using it for airships.
  • Some suggest that hydrogen could be a viable alternative for cargo transport, despite historical accidents associated with its use.
  • Financial issues are mentioned as potential reasons for the failure of past airship ventures, rather than purely technical problems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the viability of SkyCat blimps. There are multiple competing views regarding their practicality, safety, and economic potential, with some expressing optimism and others remaining skeptical.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved questions about the economic feasibility of using blimps for cargo transport, the implications of helium supply concerns, and the historical context of airship failures that may affect current perceptions.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals or organizations interested in alternative cargo transport solutions, particularly in remote or difficult terrains, as well as those exploring the future of airship technology in logistics.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
http://www.worldskycat.com/skycat/features.html

Large Payload: the SkyCat-20 has the flexibility and penetration of a helicopter but with a considerably greater payload capacity, while the SkyCat-220 significantly out-scales and out-performs all existing air freight transport alternatives.

Are these blimps going to be common in the sky?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
no way. blimps will never be common in my opinion. to cumbersome and ugly... large payload but expensive and people are still not as trusting after their not so good track record...
well that's my opinion...
and in the scheme of life what's that really matter
 
I remember seeing the Skycat a while ago. I have to agree that the dirigible track record is dismal. Germany came the closest to getting their fleet to the acceptable level, but we all know what happened there. The US has had an even worse time.

Their suceptibility to weather and other factors that have to be dealt with on a daily basis makes them impossible to use except in those areas where the weather is pretty much the same all year round. Perhaps they could be used for relief efforts in areas like Africa and other desert areas.
 
Interesting... about 8 or 10 years ago, our company was contacted to supply helium by a similar venture known as "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargolifter" ". The company was based in Germany, and had even gone as far as building an enormous hanger for the new airship.

The company was looking at a niche market - to transport oversized equipment that wouldn't otherwise be possible to move over the road, or on rail, similar to the SkyCat. At the time, it seemed like the market they were after might potentially be economical. If the blimps could tap into transporting very large equipment economically, they might find a niche market.

I guess they had many issues around this system and perhaps they eventually found it just wouldn't be economical. I suspect that's all it was. I know one of the issues was around the helium. Over a fairly short period of time, helium would diffuse out of the blimp and air would diffuse in, contaminating the helium. So every few months, the helium in the blimp would need to be 'cleaned' of air. Doing this was no small feat. They considered how to store that much gas, and came up with an idea of storing it inside an underground, concrete tube at about 1000 psig. But the size of this cavern was enormous and compressing and cleaning this very expensive gas was a serious concern. Helium today runs about $15 per 100 SCF. That’s about $500,000 for the helium alone, so you can’t just toss the gas out and put fresh in.

Perhaps the SkyCat has learned from the Cargolifter. I have to believe there are people in the SkyCat organization that came from Cargolifter. That’s typical of industry. Knowing that, there may be some hope for SkyCat, but it really depends on the ability of the company to find this niche market where they can maintain an economic advantage.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Need information

I work for a mining company and I'm scanning the market for alternatives for transporting cargo (20t containers) across very difficult topography in remote locations. Blimps with cargo lifting capacity sound very interesting to me, and I'm really willing to go a step further into a scope / prefeas. study! Believe millions USD required may still be a challenger for actual solutions.

Q_Goest, I'm interested in your experience. Could you contact me for further discussions?
 
Aren't knowledgeable people warning that the world's helium supply is about to run out in the next couple of decades?
 
sanman said:
Aren't knowledgeable people warning that the world's helium supply is about to run out in the next couple of decades?

If you are shipping cargo to remote areas there's no reason not to use hydrogen.
Yes the Hindenburg was a bit of a downer but we didn't abandon aluminium aircrraft powered by jet-A after the first accident.

I don't think the German company failure was a technical problen I think it was some financial irregulaties and a ruling that a lot of state aid they had received was illegal that sank them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K